Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe—CAPTURE EU Survey Findings

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a non-invasive method for visualising the colon, but its clinical adoption has been slow. Although the COVID-19 pandemic reignited interest in CCE, its role in conventional gastrointestinal investigations remains unclear, leading to varied practices across Europe. This highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of diverse approaches to CCE in clinical practice. <b>Method:</b> A web-based survey was conducted from January to July 2024, targeting European gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons interested in capsule endoscopy through the International Capsule Endoscopy Research (iCARE) Group. The survey aimed to understand CCE application across Europe and investigate factors influencing its uptake. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-eight (n = 38) valid responses were received from 19 European countries. While 88% reported access to CCE, only 45% had local services readily available, and just 7% included CCE in national guidelines. The most common indication for CCE was for patients who declined or could not tolerate colonoscopy (30%), with 77% of CE specialists preferring its use in fit patients. Ease of access was significantly associated with service availability (<i>p</i> = 0.0358). Barriers to uptake included lack of reimbursement, insufficient knowledge, and limited use in research settings. Only 27% of specialists viewed CCE positively, while 57% had a negative perception. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study reveals the wide variation in CCE practices and critical factors influencing its uptake. Understanding common indications and patient groups is the key to guiding its future development, particularly as AI and telemedicine enhance its potential for rapid full digestive tract visualisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010099
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe—CAPTURE EU Survey Findings

Ramesh Pulendran Arasaradnam, Alexander Robertson, Ian Io Lei, Anastasios Koulaouzidis
5 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.41
article

Evaluation of Colon Capsule Utilisation in Europe—CAPTURE EU Survey Findings

Ramesh Pulendran Arasaradnam, Alexander Robertson, Ian Io Lei, Anastasios Koulaouzidis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a non-invasive method for visualising the colon, but its clinical adoption has been slow. Although the COVID-19 pandemic reignited interest in CCE, its role in conventional gastrointestinal investigations remains unclear, leading to varied practices across Europe. This highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of diverse approaches to CCE in clinical practice. <b>Method:</b> A web-based survey was conducted from January to July 2024, targeting European gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons interested in capsule endoscopy through the International Capsule Endoscopy Research (iCARE) Group. The survey aimed to understand CCE application across Europe and investigate factors influencing its uptake. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-eight (n = 38) valid responses were received from 19 European countries. While 88% reported access to CCE, only 45% had local services readily available, and just 7% included CCE in national guidelines. The most common indication for CCE was for patients who declined or could not tolerate colonoscopy (30%), with 77% of CE specialists preferring its use in fit patients. Ease of access was significantly associated with service availability (<i>p</i> = 0.0358). Barriers to uptake included lack of reimbursement, insufficient knowledge, and limited use in research settings. Only 27% of specialists viewed CCE positively, while 57% had a negative perception. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study reveals the wide variation in CCE practices and critical factors influencing its uptake. Understanding common indications and patient groups is the key to guiding its future development, particularly as AI and telemedicine enhance its potential for rapid full digestive tract visualisation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(1)
University of Leicester (GB), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), University Hospital Coventry (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Svendborg Sygehus (DK), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.