Global Consensus on Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities: A Modified Delphi Study
Background Some studies reported research priorities for adult critical care nurses (Egerod et al., 2020, George et al., 2020). However the changing nature of health systems and the recent pandemic raise the question of whether these findings are contemporaneous and internationally relevant. Protocol and progress on the study are provided in this presentation. Aim The aim of this study is to describe contemporary global research priorities in adult critical care nursing. Method A modified eDelphi method using a 4-round online survey is utilized with an expert panel of international critical care nurses (George et al., 2020, Iqbal and Pipon-Young, 2009). The e-Delphi is the most timely and cost-effective way to obtain consensus (Nasa et al, 2021). In the initial round, panel members were asked to indicate 5 research priorities. Findings from this round will be grouped thematically into survey items (research priority areas). In round 2, panel members will be asked to rate survey items using a 9-point ordinal scale to indicate strength of agreement. Items that do not achieve the pre-set consensus level, will be sent to panel members in a 3rd round. When all research priorities are identified, panel members will be asked to rank the research priorities (round 4) in terms of contemporary importance by placing them in order of importance. The World Federation of Critical Care Nurses global network will be used to identify a purposive sample of critical care nursing experts working in association with adult intensive care units (n = 100) (Williams et al., 2023). This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Alemán, Argentina (ProtV2-05-02-23/PRIISA17feb23). Conclusion Findings of this study will potentially be crucial for governments, academic institutions, and healthcare organizations to make decisions about research funding and needs. This will help to fill in the current gaps in the literature and may generate knowledge that improve patient care in the adult critical care settings.
Authors
- Ged Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-2445)
- David Alejandro López Vázquez
- Isabel Coetzee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-2990)
- Ruth Kleinpell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-7527)
- Mathilde Elsa Christensen
- Laura Alberto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-9898)
- Paul Fulbrook (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-1861)
- Candelaria María Cafferata
- Khalil. M Yousef
Institutions
- Universidad del Salvador (AR)
- Griffith University (AU)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- University of Agder (NO)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
- University of Wollongong in Dubai (AE)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Critical Care
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc996
- Primary Topic
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00