(A)symmetric Realizations of Sonorant Sequences across the Morpheme Boundaries

This study looks over the identical sonorant sequences created by morpheme concatenation and manner assimilation in English and provides an alternative analysis, which is not entirely dependent on the stratification of affixes. A traditional view on the degemination of consonants has been that Levels 1 and 2 behave differently in phonological processes. Thus, a segment in the Level 1 affix is subject to phonological changes, which is not the case for a segment in the Level 2 affix. Accordingly, sonorant geminates made with the Level 1 affix undergo degemination, while sonorant geminates containing the Level 2 affix resist degemination. However, the realizations of identical sonorant sequences show that the affix stratification is not an absolute factor in degemination: the nasal geminate formed with the Level 1 prefix is realized either as a geminate or a degeminated consonant. On the other hand, a liquid geminate created with the Level 2 suffix is degeminated, like the liquid geminate formed with the Level 1 prefix. Thus, the study argues that the strict division of morphological level seems to become weak. (Jeonbuk National University)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21084/jmball.2024.11.42.4.169
Primary Topic
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(A)symmetric Realizations of Sonorant Sequences across the Morpheme Boundaries

Chin‐Wan Chung
The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
article

(A)symmetric Realizations of Sonorant Sequences across the Morpheme Boundaries

Chin‐Wan Chung
article en

Abstract

This study looks over the identical sonorant sequences created by morpheme concatenation and manner assimilation in English and provides an alternative analysis, which is not entirely dependent on the stratification of affixes. A traditional view on the degemination of consonants has been that Levels 1 and 2 behave differently in phonological processes. Thus, a segment in the Level 1 affix is subject to phonological changes, which is not the case for a segment in the Level 2 affix. Accordingly, sonorant geminates made with the Level 1 affix undergo degemination, while sonorant geminates containing the Level 2 affix resist degemination. However, the realizations of identical sonorant sequences show that the affix stratification is not an absolute factor in degemination: the nasal geminate formed with the Level 1 prefix is realized either as a geminate or a degeminated consonant. On the other hand, a liquid geminate created with the Level 2 suffix is degeminated, like the liquid geminate formed with the Level 1 prefix. Thus, the study argues that the strict division of morphological level seems to become weak. (Jeonbuk National University)

The Journal of Modern British & American Language & LiteratureVol. 42(4)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

(A)symmetric Realizations of Sonorant Sequences across the Morpheme Boundaries — Chin‐Wan Chung · The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS