Evaluation of Visual Implant Alphanumeric Tagging on Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Abstract Visible implant alphanumeric (VIA) tags can be beneficial in studies where individual fish must be uniquely identifiable and other tagging methods are not feasible. We examined the feasibility of tagging the endangered Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Hybognathus amarus with VIA tags. We evaluated four key aspects related to VIA tagging in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow: 1) fish survival, 2) fish growth, 3) tag retention, and 4) tag legibility. Fish were randomly selected to be VIA tagged and were held in laboratory aquaria for 49 days. Visible implant alphanumeric tagged fish survival was high (96.7%), tag retention was low (36.2%), fish growth was not affected by tagging, and most retained tags were clearly legible (71.4%). Because of low tag retention and application difficulty, VIA tagging may not be applicable to large-scale field studies of small-bodied fishes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-24-047
Primary Topic
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Visual Implant Alphanumeric Tagging on Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Thomas P. Archdeacon, Paige M. Dunnum
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
article

Evaluation of Visual Implant Alphanumeric Tagging on Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Thomas P. Archdeacon, Paige M. Dunnum
article en

Abstract

Abstract Visible implant alphanumeric (VIA) tags can be beneficial in studies where individual fish must be uniquely identifiable and other tagging methods are not feasible. We examined the feasibility of tagging the endangered Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Hybognathus amarus with VIA tags. We evaluated four key aspects related to VIA tagging in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow: 1) fish survival, 2) fish growth, 3) tag retention, and 4) tag legibility. Fish were randomly selected to be VIA tagged and were held in laboratory aquaria for 49 days. Visible implant alphanumeric tagged fish survival was high (96.7%), tag retention was low (36.2%), fish growth was not affected by tagging, and most retained tags were clearly legible (71.4%). Because of low tag retention and application difficulty, VIA tagging may not be applicable to large-scale field studies of small-bodied fishes.

Journal of Fish and Wildlife ManagementVol. 15(2)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
Bureau of Reclamation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.