The legal conflict of free speech and capital punishment: Apostasy and Blasphemy

This study examines the global tension between freedom of expression and blasphemy laws. While social media fuels debates on secular values and religious sensitivities, restrictive laws in nearly 70 countries criminalize blasphemy and apostasy, with penalties including imprisonment and death. International efforts, led by the UN, call for abolishing such penalties for non-violent offenses, yet seven countries still enforce the death penalty for blasphemy. Europe has largely decriminalized blasphemy, with nations like Ireland and England repealing such laws, though some states retain penalties for offending religious sentiments. These laws often politicize faith, suppress dissent, and target minorities, violating human rights. The study concludes that abolishing blasphemy laws is vital to protecting freedom of expression and fostering global tolerance. Keywords: freedom of expression; religion; violence; death penalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOCRATES Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.30.2024.3.19-23
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The legal conflict of free speech and capital punishment: Apostasy and Blasphemy

Valdis Voins
SOCRATES Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law
Law in Society and Culture
article

The legal conflict of free speech and capital punishment: Apostasy and Blasphemy

Valdis Voins
article en

Abstract

This study examines the global tension between freedom of expression and blasphemy laws. While social media fuels debates on secular values and religious sensitivities, restrictive laws in nearly 70 countries criminalize blasphemy and apostasy, with penalties including imprisonment and death. International efforts, led by the UN, call for abolishing such penalties for non-violent offenses, yet seven countries still enforce the death penalty for blasphemy. Europe has largely decriminalized blasphemy, with nations like Ireland and England repealing such laws, though some states retain penalties for offending religious sentiments. These laws often politicize faith, suppress dissent, and target minorities, violating human rights. The study concludes that abolishing blasphemy laws is vital to protecting freedom of expression and fostering global tolerance. Keywords: freedom of expression; religion; violence; death penalty.

SOCRATES Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of LawVol. 3(30)
State Police College (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.