Analysis of the application value of BI-RADS classification grading diagnosis based on imaging examinations for predicting atypical breast ductal hyperplasia and breast cancer

Background: To investigate the application value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification grading diagnosis based on breast ultrasound, molybdenum target radiography mammography and MRI imaging for predicting atypicalbreast ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and breast cancer (BC).Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who visited the Department of Mammary Gynecology and Obstetrics of Nanjing Medical University for breast lumps between January 2015 and July 2021, based on the pathological findings of breast lumps, included 150 patients with benign breast usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 100 patients with atypical breast hyperplasia ADH, and 100 patients with breast cancer BC.The masses were evaluated and graded according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS criteria, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves) were drawn based on ultrasound, molybdenum target radiography mammography, and MRI for BI-RADS grading to identify atypical hyperplasia (ADH) and breast cancer and the feasibility of the three imaging methods for predicting breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was compared.Results: The best cut-off value for breast ultrasound prediction of breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was BI-RADS grade 3 and the best cut-off value for molybdenum target radiography mammography and MRI prediction of breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was BI-RADS grade 4A, with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) of 0.691, 0.757, 0.866; the Jorden index was 0.363, 0.448, 0.662; the sensitivity was 56.30%, 48.20%, 71.20%; specificity 80.00%, 96.60%, 95.00%; positive predictive value 78.87%, 97.22%, 98.11%; negative predictive value 57.97%, 53.43%, 47.50%, respectively.Conclusion: BI-RADs classification grading diagnosis based on imaging examination has a high value in predicting breast dysplasia ADH and breast cancer BC.BI-RADs classification grading can be given priority in clinical prediction of breast dysplasia ADH and breast cancer BC to reduce unnecessary invasive examination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Radiation Research
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61186/ijrr.22.4.985
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the application value of BI-RADS classification grading diagnosis based on imaging examinations for predicting atypical breast ductal hyperplasia and breast cancer

Shuihua Wang‎, Song Gao, Zhuoran Jiang, Jiangtao Ma et al.
International Journal of Radiation Research
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

Analysis of the application value of BI-RADS classification grading diagnosis based on imaging examinations for predicting atypical breast ductal hyperplasia and breast cancer

Shuihua Wang‎, Song Gao, Zhuoran Jiang, Jiangtao Ma, Debin Xu, Yi Zhang, Xingxing Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: To investigate the application value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification grading diagnosis based on breast ultrasound, molybdenum target radiography mammography and MRI imaging for predicting atypicalbreast ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and breast cancer (BC).Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who visited the Department of Mammary Gynecology and Obstetrics of Nanjing Medical University for breast lumps between January 2015 and July 2021, based on the pathological findings of breast lumps, included 150 patients with benign breast usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 100 patients with atypical breast hyperplasia ADH, and 100 patients with breast cancer BC.The masses were evaluated and graded according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS criteria, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves) were drawn based on ultrasound, molybdenum target radiography mammography, and MRI for BI-RADS grading to identify atypical hyperplasia (ADH) and breast cancer and the feasibility of the three imaging methods for predicting breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was compared.Results: The best cut-off value for breast ultrasound prediction of breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was BI-RADS grade 3 and the best cut-off value for molybdenum target radiography mammography and MRI prediction of breast atypical hyperplasia ADH and breast cancer BC was BI-RADS grade 4A, with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) of 0.691, 0.757, 0.866; the Jorden index was 0.363, 0.448, 0.662; the sensitivity was 56.30%, 48.20%, 71.20%; specificity 80.00%, 96.60%, 95.00%; positive predictive value 78.87%, 97.22%, 98.11%; negative predictive value 57.97%, 53.43%, 47.50%, respectively.Conclusion: BI-RADs classification grading diagnosis based on imaging examination has a high value in predicting breast dysplasia ADH and breast cancer BC.BI-RADs classification grading can be given priority in clinical prediction of breast dysplasia ADH and breast cancer BC to reduce unnecessary invasive examination.

International Journal of Radiation ResearchVol. 22(4)
Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN)
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.