Laboratory Tests of Two Versions of a Planting Tool for Seedlings with a Covered Root System – Comparison, Part 1

This publication is aimed mainly at growers interested in improving the process of planting trees with a covered root system – in particular, in the use of a planting tool sunk into the ground. Two versions of the planting tool were made, with specific kinematics of operation. The tools differ geometrically, mainly in their diameter and the shape of the tip penetrating the ground. Tool penetration tests were carried out in laboratory conditions to assess their penetration efficiency. The research was conducted to determine how the tool’s geometry affects the efficiency of its work. Another goal was to compare tools with two different shapes but the same work kinematics. As a result of the work, penetration values for both versions of the tool were obtained under the same working conditions, but these were laboratory conditions. The results obtained in theory indicate the greater efficiency of one version of the tool over the other. Practical conclusions also concern the aspect of tool strength, which is most likely lower in the case of the tool with more aggressive penetration characteristics. The key outcome of the research for those interested in implementing a tool for planting trees with a covered root system is that it indicates the advantages and disad-vantages of both versions of the tool, including those relating to the efficiency of operation. The results require confirmation through research in real conditions (field conditions), where the variability of soil parameters is significant.