Reflections on the possible application of Rome I Regulation to obligations related to crypto-assets

Regulation No. 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and Council of 31 May 2023 on cryptoasset markets is a crucial component of financial market regulation that has significantly contributed to increasing the legal security of its participants. This study does not aim to analyse the basic rules of crypto-asset trading or make an assessment of their legal status but rather seeks to determine how the law applicable to obligations related to crypto-assets could be determined. Linking a given transaction to more than one legal area is one of the essential features of modern global financial markets. Given the above, this paper analyses possible subsidiary application of the Regulation No. 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I to cryptoassets). The primary research method employed is the dogmatic-legal method, supplemented by the theoretical-legal method. The most important goals of these research methods are to identify the scope of validity of given norms, analyse their practical application, and draw conclusions. Both methods were used to determine whether the scope of the Rome I regulations allows the application of its provisions to obligations related to crypto-assets. Therefore, this article seeks to address whether the rules related to contractual obligations can also be applied to crypto-assets. The arguments presented in this work do not exclude such a possibility. However, the author notes that the level of regulation of financial markets in terms of conflicts of laws cannot be considered sufficient and completed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.4.02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on the possible application of Rome I Regulation to obligations related to crypto-assets

Michał Mariański
1 citations
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
2.23
article

Reflections on the possible application of Rome I Regulation to obligations related to crypto-assets

Michał Mariański
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Regulation No. 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and Council of 31 May 2023 on cryptoasset markets is a crucial component of financial market regulation that has significantly contributed to increasing the legal security of its participants. This study does not aim to analyse the basic rules of crypto-asset trading or make an assessment of their legal status but rather seeks to determine how the law applicable to obligations related to crypto-assets could be determined. Linking a given transaction to more than one legal area is one of the essential features of modern global financial markets. Given the above, this paper analyses possible subsidiary application of the Regulation No. 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I to cryptoassets). The primary research method employed is the dogmatic-legal method, supplemented by the theoretical-legal method. The most important goals of these research methods are to identify the scope of validity of given norms, analyse their practical application, and draw conclusions. Both methods were used to determine whether the scope of the Rome I regulations allows the application of its provisions to obligations related to crypto-assets. Therefore, this article seeks to address whether the rules related to contractual obligations can also be applied to crypto-assets. The arguments presented in this work do not exclude such a possibility. However, the author notes that the level of regulation of financial markets in terms of conflicts of laws cannot be considered sufficient and completed.

Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i SocjologicznyVol. 86(4)
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.