Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterior Short-Segment Fixation Including the Fractured Vertebra Without Fusion Versus With Fusion in the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures

Background: Posterior short-segment fixation with pedicle screws has been utilized for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures to minimize the number of fixed levels. However, it has been associated with implant failure. The short same-segment fixation (including the fractured level) provides more biomechanical stability. Spinal fusion might be used to decrease implant failure. We conducted this study to compare the outcomes between fixation without fusion and fixation with fusion. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted during the period between June 2016 and January 2021, including 43 patients with unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were examined neurologically using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score. Patients underwent posterior short-segment fixation, including the fractured vertebrae, with or without fusion. The outcome measures, back pain using VAS, local kyphotic angle (LKA), anterior vertebral height loss (AVHL), operative time, and blood loss were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the nonfusion (Group I; n = 23) group and the fusion group (Group II; n = 20). All patients’ data and complications were recorded. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, gender, fracture level, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Scoring System (TLICS), McCormack score, ASIA score, and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the VAS score was 2.3 ± 1.6 in the nonfusion group and 2.4 ± 1.4 in the fusion group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. In the nonfusion group, the LKA was corrected from 20.11° preoperatively to 1.25° postoperatively and from 19.61° to 1.27° in the fusion group. Moreover, the preoperative AVHL improved from 53.67% to 16.61% postoperatively in the nonfusion group. Whereas, in the fusion group, it improved from 55.68% to 17.81% postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the correction of LKA or AVHL. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding operative time (p < 0.001) and blood loss (p < 0.05) in favor of Group I. Conclusion: Posterior short same-segment fixation, with or without fusion, is efficient and safe in treating thoracolumbar fractures. Fixation without fusion has the advantage of avoiding graft donor-site complications and less operative time and blood loss. The addition of fusion may increase the strength and sustainability of fixation, although there were no considerable difference between the two groups. These findings need more randomized trials with longer-term follow-ups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Spine Journal
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57055/2974-4822.1311
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterior Short-Segment Fixation Including the Fractured Vertebra Without Fusion Versus With Fusion in the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures

Hany EA Elashmawy
1 citations
Advanced Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
0.57
article

Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterior Short-Segment Fixation Including the Fractured Vertebra Without Fusion Versus With Fusion in the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures

Hany EA Elashmawy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Posterior short-segment fixation with pedicle screws has been utilized for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures to minimize the number of fixed levels. However, it has been associated with implant failure. The short same-segment fixation (including the fractured level) provides more biomechanical stability. Spinal fusion might be used to decrease implant failure. We conducted this study to compare the outcomes between fixation without fusion and fixation with fusion. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted during the period between June 2016 and January 2021, including 43 patients with unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were examined neurologically using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score. Patients underwent posterior short-segment fixation, including the fractured vertebrae, with or without fusion. The outcome measures, back pain using VAS, local kyphotic angle (LKA), anterior vertebral height loss (AVHL), operative time, and blood loss were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the nonfusion (Group I; n = 23) group and the fusion group (Group II; n = 20). All patients’ data and complications were recorded. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, gender, fracture level, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Scoring System (TLICS), McCormack score, ASIA score, and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the VAS score was 2.3 ± 1.6 in the nonfusion group and 2.4 ± 1.4 in the fusion group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. In the nonfusion group, the LKA was corrected from 20.11° preoperatively to 1.25° postoperatively and from 19.61° to 1.27° in the fusion group. Moreover, the preoperative AVHL improved from 53.67% to 16.61% postoperatively in the nonfusion group. Whereas, in the fusion group, it improved from 55.68% to 17.81% postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the correction of LKA or AVHL. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding operative time (p < 0.001) and blood loss (p < 0.05) in favor of Group I. Conclusion: Posterior short same-segment fixation, with or without fusion, is efficient and safe in treating thoracolumbar fractures. Fixation without fusion has the advantage of avoiding graft donor-site complications and less operative time and blood loss. The addition of fusion may increase the strength and sustainability of fixation, although there were no considerable difference between the two groups. These findings need more randomized trials with longer-term follow-ups.

Advanced Spine JournalVol. 43(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.