Prevalence of rare anatomic variants - publication bias due to selective reporting in meta-analyses studies

Meta-analyses of prevalence studies reporting rare anatomic variants are prone to selective reporting of non-null, confirmatory results, thus resulting in publication bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Medica
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.66.e137881
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of rare anatomic variants - publication bias due to selective reporting in meta-analyses studies

Aliki Fiska, Vasileios Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Filippou
4 citations
Folia Medica
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.85
article

Prevalence of rare anatomic variants - publication bias due to selective reporting in meta-analyses studies

Aliki Fiska, Vasileios Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Filippou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Meta-analyses of prevalence studies reporting rare anatomic variants are prone to selective reporting of non-null, confirmatory results, thus resulting in publication bias.

Folia MedicaVol. 66(6)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.