A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss

Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss (PL) is a critical public health concern. However, PL is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or nongeneralizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about PL by using more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births (ie, live-birth-identified conceptions [LBICs]). We simulated 10 years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and 2 nitrogen dioxide (NO2)-PL relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the 2 NO2-PL relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of CIs captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live-birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, we found that higher prenatal NO2 exposure was associated with more PLs. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of PL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss

Anna Merport Modest, Marianthi‐Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Joel Schwartz, Yaguang Wei et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
0.58
article

A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss

Anna Merport Modest, Marianthi‐Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Joel Schwartz, Yaguang Wei, Ander Wilson, Michele R. Hacker, Brent A. Coull, Sebastian T. Rowland, Michael C.M. Leung, Stefania Papatheodorou, Marc G. Weisskopf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss (PL) is a critical public health concern. However, PL is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or nongeneralizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about PL by using more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births (ie, live-birth-identified conceptions [LBICs]). We simulated 10 years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and 2 nitrogen dioxide (NO2)-PL relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the 2 NO2-PL relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of CIs captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live-birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, we found that higher prenatal NO2 exposure was associated with more PLs. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of PL.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(11)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), City University of New York (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Healthy Start (US), Columbia University (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.