Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility criteria in emulated target trials

Target trial emulation (TTE) is a popular framework for observational studies based on electronic health records (EHRs). A key component of this framework is determining the patient population eligible for inclusion in both a target trial of interest and its observational emulation. Missingness in variables that define eligibility criteria, however, presents a major challenge in determining the eligible population when emulating a target trial with an observational study. In practice, patients with incomplete data are almost always excluded from analysis despite the possibility of selection bias, which can arise when participants with observed eligibility data are fundamentally different than excluded individuals. Despite this, to our knowledge, very little work has been done to mitigate this concern. In this article, we propose a novel conceptual framework to address selection bias in TTE studies, tailored toward time-to-event end points, and we describe estimation and inferential procedures via inverse probability weighting. Under an EHR-based simulation infrastructure, developed to reflect the complexity of EHR data, we characterize common settings under which missing eligibility data pose the threat of selection bias and investigate the ability of the proposed methods to address it. Finally, using EHR databases from Kaiser Permanente, we demonstrate the use of our method to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on microvascular outcomes among a cohort of patients with severe obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae471
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility criteria in emulated target trials

Susan M. Shortreed, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Catherine Lee, Luke Benz et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Statistical Methods and Inference
0.71
article

Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility criteria in emulated target trials

Susan M. Shortreed, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Catherine Lee, Luke Benz, David Arterburn, Heidi Fischer, Rui Wang, Sebastien Haneuse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Target trial emulation (TTE) is a popular framework for observational studies based on electronic health records (EHRs). A key component of this framework is determining the patient population eligible for inclusion in both a target trial of interest and its observational emulation. Missingness in variables that define eligibility criteria, however, presents a major challenge in determining the eligible population when emulating a target trial with an observational study. In practice, patients with incomplete data are almost always excluded from analysis despite the possibility of selection bias, which can arise when participants with observed eligibility data are fundamentally different than excluded individuals. Despite this, to our knowledge, very little work has been done to mitigate this concern. In this article, we propose a novel conceptual framework to address selection bias in TTE studies, tailored toward time-to-event end points, and we describe estimation and inferential procedures via inverse probability weighting. Under an EHR-based simulation infrastructure, developed to reflect the complexity of EHR data, we characterize common settings under which missing eligibility data pose the threat of selection bias and investigate the ability of the proposed methods to address it. Finally, using EHR databases from Kaiser Permanente, we demonstrate the use of our method to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on microvascular outcomes among a cohort of patients with severe obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(11)
Kaiser Permanente (US), Harvard University (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
National Institutes of Health
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Statistical Methods and Inference
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.