Jurisprudential Analysis of Historical Rights in the South China Sea Dispute

This paper explores the legal basis and legitimacy of China’s claimed historical rights in the South China Sea dispute. By reviewing the principles and precedents of international law regarding historical rights, and combining rich historical evidence, it is argued that China’s territorial sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, historical rights within the U-shaped line, and traditional fishing rights in certain waters, all have a solid jurisprudential foundation that meets the constituent elements for the formation of historical rights, and should be recognized and protected under international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The paper also points out that the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration Award, which rejected China’s historical rights claims, seriously deviates from objective facts and legal rules, lacking legitimacy. Historical rights play an important role in resolving the South China Sea dispute and maintaining regional peace and stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Economy
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56397/le.2024.12.05
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisprudential Analysis of Historical Rights in the South China Sea Dispute

Zhu Peihao
Law and Economy
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Jurisprudential Analysis of Historical Rights in the South China Sea Dispute

Zhu Peihao
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the legal basis and legitimacy of China’s claimed historical rights in the South China Sea dispute. By reviewing the principles and precedents of international law regarding historical rights, and combining rich historical evidence, it is argued that China’s territorial sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, historical rights within the U-shaped line, and traditional fishing rights in certain waters, all have a solid jurisprudential foundation that meets the constituent elements for the formation of historical rights, and should be recognized and protected under international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The paper also points out that the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration Award, which rejected China’s historical rights claims, seriously deviates from objective facts and legal rules, lacking legitimacy. Historical rights play an important role in resolving the South China Sea dispute and maintaining regional peace and stability.

Law and EconomyVol. 3(12)
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.