Exploring the Common Ground: A Comparative Analysis of Zoroastrianism and Islam

Islam and Zoroastrianism share remarkable similarities in their theological and eschatological beliefs. They both believe in the oneness of God, with different names (Ahura Mazda for Zoroastrians and Allah for Muslims) but similar attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence. Both religions acknowledge archangels, with Zoroastrianism recognizing six and Islam recognizing four, along with other minor angels. Both religions consider humans as the pinnacle of creation and emphasize the establishment of justice and truth on earth. They share beliefs about the nature of the universe as a creation of God, and the role of prophets as messengers of God. Prayer is considered important in both religions, with similar practices of five daily prayers (Salat in Islam, Gah Worship in Zoroastrianism) and similar beliefs about the afterlife, including the immortality of the soul, resurrection of the dead, balance of judgment, heaven and hell, and the existence of a bridge to be crossed after death (Chinvat Bridge in Zoroastrianism, Al-Siraat in Islam). Ethical codes emphasizing purity of mind and body are also similar in both religions. Thus, this article argues, using intertextuality theory, that Islam is not a new beginning but rather a continuation of earlier revelations, such as Zoroastrianism. This perspective further suggests that Zoroastrianism can be categorized within the Abrahamic traditions. JASBH, Vol. 69(2), 2024, pp. 223-237

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh Humanities
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbh.v69i2.78650
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Common Ground: A Comparative Analysis of Zoroastrianism and Islam

Shafi Md Mostofa
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh Humanities
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

Exploring the Common Ground: A Comparative Analysis of Zoroastrianism and Islam

Shafi Md Mostofa
article en

Abstract

Islam and Zoroastrianism share remarkable similarities in their theological and eschatological beliefs. They both believe in the oneness of God, with different names (Ahura Mazda for Zoroastrians and Allah for Muslims) but similar attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence. Both religions acknowledge archangels, with Zoroastrianism recognizing six and Islam recognizing four, along with other minor angels. Both religions consider humans as the pinnacle of creation and emphasize the establishment of justice and truth on earth. They share beliefs about the nature of the universe as a creation of God, and the role of prophets as messengers of God. Prayer is considered important in both religions, with similar practices of five daily prayers (Salat in Islam, Gah Worship in Zoroastrianism) and similar beliefs about the afterlife, including the immortality of the soul, resurrection of the dead, balance of judgment, heaven and hell, and the existence of a bridge to be crossed after death (Chinvat Bridge in Zoroastrianism, Al-Siraat in Islam). Ethical codes emphasizing purity of mind and body are also similar in both religions. Thus, this article argues, using intertextuality theory, that Islam is not a new beginning but rather a continuation of earlier revelations, such as Zoroastrianism. This perspective further suggests that Zoroastrianism can be categorized within the Abrahamic traditions. JASBH, Vol. 69(2), 2024, pp. 223-237

Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh HumanitiesVol. 69(2)
World University of Bangladesh (BD)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.