ETHICS AND ACCEPTANCE OF AI

Abstract Over the past 18 months, artificial intelligence (AI) applications have proliferated and been disseminated across wider audiences than in prior time periods. AI tools are increasingly being used as part of new biomedical devices and may become more integrated into healthcare processes over time. While AI applications may have significant value in healthcare and helping support older adults and individuals across the life course through a variety of mechanisms, if individuals do not perceive these tools as ethical and are not accepting of these new tools, they are likely to fail. Cotten and colleagues report the results of a scoping review designed to assess stakeholder (e.g., patients and healthcare providers) acceptance and willingness to use AI-enabled devices in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation settings. The results of this study identify perceived challenges of integrating AI into healthcare across stakeholder groups and provide suggestions to help advance AI acceptance and reduce ethical concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0911
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ETHICS AND ACCEPTANCE OF AI

Jihad S. Obeid, Catherine Mobley, Aishah Khan, Xia Jing et al.
2 citations
Innovation in Aging
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

ETHICS AND ACCEPTANCE OF AI

Jihad S. Obeid, Catherine Mobley, Aishah Khan, Xia Jing, Nina Hubig, Grant Goodrich, Shelia R. Cotten, Hamilton Baker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over the past 18 months, artificial intelligence (AI) applications have proliferated and been disseminated across wider audiences than in prior time periods. AI tools are increasingly being used as part of new biomedical devices and may become more integrated into healthcare processes over time. While AI applications may have significant value in healthcare and helping support older adults and individuals across the life course through a variety of mechanisms, if individuals do not perceive these tools as ethical and are not accepting of these new tools, they are likely to fail. Cotten and colleagues report the results of a scoping review designed to assess stakeholder (e.g., patients and healthcare providers) acceptance and willingness to use AI-enabled devices in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation settings. The results of this study identify perceived challenges of integrating AI into healthcare across stakeholder groups and provide suggestions to help advance AI acceptance and reduce ethical concerns.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.