AComparativeReviewofDeepFakeDetectionAlgorithmswithMachineLearning

In the rapidly evolving landscape of deepfake technology, which poses substantial threats to privacy and security, this research conducts a comparative analysis between two advanced detection methods: The VIT image classifier employing convolutional neural networks and the Meso4 method to analyse images at mesoscopic level.Motivated by the pervasive impact of deepfakes on individuals, particularly celebrities and politicians, the study aims to discern the effectiveness of these methods in distinguishing authentic from manipulated images.The methodological approach prioritizes practical implementation, utilizing the DFDC (Deep Fake Detection Challenge by Kaggle) dataset for ViT and a combination of self made and Face2Face dataset for Meso4 model.The DFDC dataset is a massive 260 GB dataset comprising over 1 million images, both real and fake, while the combined dataset for MESO consists of approximately 400 videos made by the author and over a thousand videos from the Face2Face dataset, encompassing real and fake instances.The ViT model exhibits exceptional proficiency, achieving a 99.9% accuracy within its dataset and an 85% accuracy for subtly deceptive images.Conversely, the Meso4 model faces challenges, resulting in a 60% accuracy and displaying biases, particularly towards female subjects due to its heavy trainings on adult content.In conclusion, the VIT image processor emerges as a superior and user-friendly method, despite its substantial data footprint, showcasing superior efficacy, especially in real-world scenarios.The findings emphasize the importance of advancing robust and unbiased deep fake detection methods, acknowledging considerations such as model size in the context of application requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.5846
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AComparativeReviewofDeepFakeDetectionAlgorithmswithMachineLearning

Mr.S. Govindaraj
2 citations
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
0.99
article

AComparativeReviewofDeepFakeDetectionAlgorithmswithMachineLearning

Mr.S. Govindaraj
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of deepfake technology, which poses substantial threats to privacy and security, this research conducts a comparative analysis between two advanced detection methods: The VIT image classifier employing convolutional neural networks and the Meso4 method to analyse images at mesoscopic level.Motivated by the pervasive impact of deepfakes on individuals, particularly celebrities and politicians, the study aims to discern the effectiveness of these methods in distinguishing authentic from manipulated images.The methodological approach prioritizes practical implementation, utilizing the DFDC (Deep Fake Detection Challenge by Kaggle) dataset for ViT and a combination of self made and Face2Face dataset for Meso4 model.The DFDC dataset is a massive 260 GB dataset comprising over 1 million images, both real and fake, while the combined dataset for MESO consists of approximately 400 videos made by the author and over a thousand videos from the Face2Face dataset, encompassing real and fake instances.The ViT model exhibits exceptional proficiency, achieving a 99.9% accuracy within its dataset and an 85% accuracy for subtly deceptive images.Conversely, the Meso4 model faces challenges, resulting in a 60% accuracy and displaying biases, particularly towards female subjects due to its heavy trainings on adult content.In conclusion, the VIT image processor emerges as a superior and user-friendly method, despite its substantial data footprint, showcasing superior efficacy, especially in real-world scenarios.The findings emphasize the importance of advancing robust and unbiased deep fake detection methods, acknowledging considerations such as model size in the context of application requirements.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.