STRESS AND IDENTITY FOR LGBTQ+ HEALTH: MODELING RISK AND RESILIENCE

Abstract Marginalized communities, including lesbian and gay populations, may experience unique experiences and expectations associated with growing older. The present study aimed to provide a preliminary model of how lesbian and gay adults view their own aging and identify psychosocial risk and resilience factors specific to this community. Data are from a pilot study of social perceptions of aging in lesbian and gay middle-aged and older adults, in which 45 gay and 46 lesbian adults participants (ages = 55-87, 70% white) completed questionnaires on their health, perceptions of aging, community engagement and identity congruence, and stressful experiences. Self-perceptions of aging were measured with an 8 item scale ranging from 1 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater agreement with positive perceptions of aging (e.g., “So far, I am satisfied with the way that I am aging.”). In a regression model accounting for self-rated health, subjective socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity, lesbian women reported better self-perceptions of aging than gay men (b = 0.50, SE = 0.16, p <.01). Further, greater outness was associated with better self-perceptions of aging (b = 0.04, SE = 0.01, p <.01), LGBTQ+ community engagement did not relate to self-perceptions of aging (b = -0.10, SE = 0.12, p =.40), and more stressful experiences in daily life were associated with worse self-perceptions of aging (b = -0.15, SE = 0.05, p <.01). Results will be discussed in the context of a model of risk and resilience for “accelerated social aging” among LGBTQ+ populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.3726
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STRESS AND IDENTITY FOR LGBTQ+ HEALTH: MODELING RISK AND RESILIENCE

M. Aaron Guest, Rachel Koffer, Erin T. Clancy, Aanika Dhawan
Innovation in Aging
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

STRESS AND IDENTITY FOR LGBTQ+ HEALTH: MODELING RISK AND RESILIENCE

M. Aaron Guest, Rachel Koffer, Erin T. Clancy, Aanika Dhawan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Marginalized communities, including lesbian and gay populations, may experience unique experiences and expectations associated with growing older. The present study aimed to provide a preliminary model of how lesbian and gay adults view their own aging and identify psychosocial risk and resilience factors specific to this community. Data are from a pilot study of social perceptions of aging in lesbian and gay middle-aged and older adults, in which 45 gay and 46 lesbian adults participants (ages = 55-87, 70% white) completed questionnaires on their health, perceptions of aging, community engagement and identity congruence, and stressful experiences. Self-perceptions of aging were measured with an 8 item scale ranging from 1 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater agreement with positive perceptions of aging (e.g., “So far, I am satisfied with the way that I am aging.”). In a regression model accounting for self-rated health, subjective socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity, lesbian women reported better self-perceptions of aging than gay men (b = 0.50, SE = 0.16, p <.01). Further, greater outness was associated with better self-perceptions of aging (b = 0.04, SE = 0.01, p <.01), LGBTQ+ community engagement did not relate to self-perceptions of aging (b = -0.10, SE = 0.12, p =.40), and more stressful experiences in daily life were associated with worse self-perceptions of aging (b = -0.15, SE = 0.05, p <.01). Results will be discussed in the context of a model of risk and resilience for “accelerated social aging” among LGBTQ+ populations.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

STRESS AND IDENTITY FOR LGBTQ+ HEALTH: MODELING RISK AND RESILIENCE — M. Aaron Guest, Rachel Koffer, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS