LONG-TERM PATTERNS OF FAMILY AND PAID CAREGIVING BY CARE TYPES AND SOURCES

Abstract To support aging in place for community-dwelling older adults, sustainable long-term care and support are crucial. The existing literature often focuses on family caregiving, formal caregiving, or their relationship, such as whether they substitute for each other. This study aims to broaden the understanding of collaborative care by exploring the intersection of different care forms and caregiver sources, an area that is less studied. Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011-2022), this research examines longitudinal patterns of caregiving, focusing on the types of services (ADL/IADL support) and their sources (unpaid informal, paid formal, and paid family caregivers). The study sample included individuals who received consistent caregiver support throughout the study period. Group-based multiple trajectory (GBMT) modeling identified four distinct care mix patterns: (1) consistently low care (72.2%), (2) increasing ADL informal care (18.3%), (3) increasing formal care (7.4%), and (4) decreasing formal care with increasing paid informal care (2.1%). Compared to the relatively healthy and less vulnerable “consistently low care” group, those receiving “increasing ADL informal care” were more likely to be married women, while those with “increasing formal care” tended to live alone, be male, and have dementia. Notably, individuals with “decreasing formal care but increasing paid family care” were often racial minorities, in poor health, and older, possibly utilizing consumer-directed care programs. These findings provide an initial empirical foundation for understanding care mix, highlighting the need for further research on gender-specific caregiving patterns and the impacts of these care trajectories on health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.3866
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LONG-TERM PATTERNS OF FAMILY AND PAID CAREGIVING BY CARE TYPES AND SOURCES

Seoyeon Ahn, Eunsun Kwon, Esther Shin, Soobin Park et al.
Innovation in Aging
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

LONG-TERM PATTERNS OF FAMILY AND PAID CAREGIVING BY CARE TYPES AND SOURCES

Seoyeon Ahn, Eunsun Kwon, Esther Shin, Soobin Park, Sojung Park, BoRin Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract To support aging in place for community-dwelling older adults, sustainable long-term care and support are crucial. The existing literature often focuses on family caregiving, formal caregiving, or their relationship, such as whether they substitute for each other. This study aims to broaden the understanding of collaborative care by exploring the intersection of different care forms and caregiver sources, an area that is less studied. Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011-2022), this research examines longitudinal patterns of caregiving, focusing on the types of services (ADL/IADL support) and their sources (unpaid informal, paid formal, and paid family caregivers). The study sample included individuals who received consistent caregiver support throughout the study period. Group-based multiple trajectory (GBMT) modeling identified four distinct care mix patterns: (1) consistently low care (72.2%), (2) increasing ADL informal care (18.3%), (3) increasing formal care (7.4%), and (4) decreasing formal care with increasing paid informal care (2.1%). Compared to the relatively healthy and less vulnerable “consistently low care” group, those receiving “increasing ADL informal care” were more likely to be married women, while those with “increasing formal care” tended to live alone, be male, and have dementia. Notably, individuals with “decreasing formal care but increasing paid family care” were often racial minorities, in poor health, and older, possibly utilizing consumer-directed care programs. These findings provide an initial empirical foundation for understanding care mix, highlighting the need for further research on gender-specific caregiving patterns and the impacts of these care trajectories on health outcomes.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of New Hampshire (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Fairleigh Dickinson University (US), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Illinois State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.