Pioneering Efforts: Cardiac Device Implantation Trends and Variable Patient Outcomes – A Community Benefit Tool

Objectives: To analyze trends in cardiac device implantation and interventions, along with patient outcomes, at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2020 at NICVD, Karachi. Patients presenting to outpatient or emergency departments with diagnoses of bradycardia (sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular blocks), heart failure, survival of sudden cardiac death (SCD), or cardiomyopathy, and meeting the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association criteria for device-based therapies, were included. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, device types, indications, and post-procedural outcomes, including complications and mortality, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 5,166 cases were analyzed over the four-year study period, with 2,991 (57.9%) males and a mean age of 58.2 ± 22.4 years. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, affecting 1,872 (36.2%) patients. Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers (DDDR) were the most frequently implanted devices, accounting for 1,943 (37.6%) cases, while single-chamber implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) were predominantly used for secondary prevention in ischemic heart disease. Complete heart block was the most common indication, observed in 1,794 (34.7%) patients. Post-procedural complications were infrequent, with hematoma and wound infections being the most common. Mortality was reported in 23 (0.4%) patients. Conclusion: Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers (DDDR) emerged as the most frequently implanted pacemakers, while single-chamber ICDs were the preferred defibrillators for secondary prevention. Complete heart block was the leading indication for device implantation. Post-procedural complications, including hematoma and wound infection, were rare, and overall mortality associated with cardiac device implantation was remarkably low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Heart Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v57i4.2837
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pioneering Efforts: Cardiac Device Implantation Trends and Variable Patient Outcomes – A Community Benefit Tool

Muhammad Sarim Ansari, Reema Qayoom, Ghulam Kubra, Ghazala Irfan et al.
1 citations
Pakistan Heart Journal
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
article

Pioneering Efforts: Cardiac Device Implantation Trends and Variable Patient Outcomes – A Community Benefit Tool

Muhammad Sarim Ansari, Reema Qayoom, Ghulam Kubra, Ghazala Irfan, Deebaj Nadeem, Faiza Sikandari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze trends in cardiac device implantation and interventions, along with patient outcomes, at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2020 at NICVD, Karachi. Patients presenting to outpatient or emergency departments with diagnoses of bradycardia (sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular blocks), heart failure, survival of sudden cardiac death (SCD), or cardiomyopathy, and meeting the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association criteria for device-based therapies, were included. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, device types, indications, and post-procedural outcomes, including complications and mortality, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 5,166 cases were analyzed over the four-year study period, with 2,991 (57.9%) males and a mean age of 58.2 ± 22.4 years. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, affecting 1,872 (36.2%) patients. Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers (DDDR) were the most frequently implanted devices, accounting for 1,943 (37.6%) cases, while single-chamber implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) were predominantly used for secondary prevention in ischemic heart disease. Complete heart block was the most common indication, observed in 1,794 (34.7%) patients. Post-procedural complications were infrequent, with hematoma and wound infections being the most common. Mortality was reported in 23 (0.4%) patients. Conclusion: Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers (DDDR) emerged as the most frequently implanted pacemakers, while single-chamber ICDs were the preferred defibrillators for secondary prevention. Complete heart block was the leading indication for device implantation. Post-procedural complications, including hematoma and wound infection, were rare, and overall mortality associated with cardiac device implantation was remarkably low.

Pakistan Heart JournalVol. 57(4)
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.