Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Critical Care Nurses in Iran towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Background Pressure ulcers (PUs) pose a significant health problem that can be prevented in various healthcare settings, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). PU increases the risk of morbidity and mortality and is associated with poor prognosis in ICU patients. ICU prevalence rates for PU have been estimated to range from 21% to 39.3% worldwide (Coyer et al., 2022). According to a recent meta-analysis, the prevalence of PU in Iran's ICUs was 19.59% (Sohrabi Akhkand et al., 2020). Despite these alarming facts, PU is often preventable with adherence of healthcare providers to evidence-based PU prevention guidelines. One of the most important factors influencing PU prevention is adequate knowledge of ICU nurses to evaluate and manage risk factors and implement preventative approaches (Wu et al., 2022; Ghorbani Vajargah et al., 2023). Aims This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of ICU nurses towards PU prevention in Iran. Methods In a multicenter cross-sectional study, after approval from institutional ethics committee (IR.MAZUMS.REC.1399.591) and written informed consent, 183 ICU nurses working in four hospitals affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in Sari, Iran, were evaluated. The study was carried out between July and October 2020. Data collection involved a four-part questionnaire consisting of demographic characteristics, the Pieker Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PPUKT), the Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APUP) tool, and an assessment of nurses' practices related to PU prevention. Results The mean age of participants was 32.82 (SD = 5.93) years and the mean years of working experience was 8.26 (SD = 6.02) years. Of the nurses, 56.2% were female, 63.4% were married, 87.4% were residents in an urban area, and 76.5% had a BSN degree. The mean scores for ICU nurses' KAP regarding PU prevention were 70.57 (SD = 13.51), 52.82 (SD = 6.16), and 22.44 (SD = 5.20), respectively. As presented in Table 1, a positive correlation was observed between nurses' attitudes and their practices (r = 0.232, P = 0.002), while a negative correlation was found between their knowledge and attitudes (r = -0.156, P = 0.035) towards PU prevention. Also, the results showed a positive correlation between the years of ICU work experience among nurses and their knowledge of PU prevention (r = 0.159, P = 0.032). The same result was also observed for the overall years of working experience, although this correlation was marginally significant (r = 0.145, P = 0.051). Based on a one-way ANOVA, there was a direct relationship between knowledge and income, and knowledge were higher in high-income nurses (P = 0.017). Table 1: Means, Standard Deviations, and correlations among study variables. Descriptive statistics Correlational analysis Possible range Observed range Mean (SD) Knowledge Attitude Practice Knowledge 0-100 39.02-100 70.57 (13.51) 1 Attitude 0-100 32.69-67.31 52.82 (6.16) -0.156 1 Practice 0-44 10-37 22.44 (5.20) -0.119 0.232 1 Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that the KAP levels of Iranian ICU nurses regarding PU prevention were desirable, positive, and relatively desirable. Therefore, it is recommended that nurse managers and policy makers address the major barriers and related factors that may affect ICU nurses' practices in preventing PUs. References Coyer F, Labeau S, Blot S. (2022) Preventing pressure injuries among patients in the intensive care unit: insights gained. Intensive Care Medicine. 48(12):1787-1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06838-3. Ghorbani Vajargah P, Mollaei A, Falakdami A, Takasi P, Moosazadeh Z, Esmaeili S, Emami Zeydi A, Karkhah S. (2023) A systematic review of nurses' practice and related factors toward pressure ulcer prevention. International Wound Journal. 20(6):2386-2401. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14062. Sohrabi Akhkand S, Seidi J, Ebadi A, Ghanei Gheshlagh R. (2020) Prevalence of pressure ulcer in Iran’s intensive care units: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Nursing Practice Today. 7(1) doi.org/10.18502/npt.v7i1.2296 Wu J, Wang B, Zhu L, Jia X. (2022) Nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool. Frontiers in Public Health. 10:964680. doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964680.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Critical Care
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc999
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Critical Care Nurses in Iran towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Saman Maroufizadeh, Amir Emami Zeydi, Samad Karkhah, Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Critical Care
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
1.72
article

Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Critical Care Nurses in Iran towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Saman Maroufizadeh, Amir Emami Zeydi, Samad Karkhah, Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari, Mohammad Hashem Gholampour
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Pressure ulcers (PUs) pose a significant health problem that can be prevented in various healthcare settings, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). PU increases the risk of morbidity and mortality and is associated with poor prognosis in ICU patients. ICU prevalence rates for PU have been estimated to range from 21% to 39.3% worldwide (Coyer et al., 2022). According to a recent meta-analysis, the prevalence of PU in Iran's ICUs was 19.59% (Sohrabi Akhkand et al., 2020). Despite these alarming facts, PU is often preventable with adherence of healthcare providers to evidence-based PU prevention guidelines. One of the most important factors influencing PU prevention is adequate knowledge of ICU nurses to evaluate and manage risk factors and implement preventative approaches (Wu et al., 2022; Ghorbani Vajargah et al., 2023). Aims This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of ICU nurses towards PU prevention in Iran. Methods In a multicenter cross-sectional study, after approval from institutional ethics committee (IR.MAZUMS.REC.1399.591) and written informed consent, 183 ICU nurses working in four hospitals affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in Sari, Iran, were evaluated. The study was carried out between July and October 2020. Data collection involved a four-part questionnaire consisting of demographic characteristics, the Pieker Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PPUKT), the Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APUP) tool, and an assessment of nurses' practices related to PU prevention. Results The mean age of participants was 32.82 (SD = 5.93) years and the mean years of working experience was 8.26 (SD = 6.02) years. Of the nurses, 56.2% were female, 63.4% were married, 87.4% were residents in an urban area, and 76.5% had a BSN degree. The mean scores for ICU nurses' KAP regarding PU prevention were 70.57 (SD = 13.51), 52.82 (SD = 6.16), and 22.44 (SD = 5.20), respectively. As presented in Table 1, a positive correlation was observed between nurses' attitudes and their practices (r = 0.232, P = 0.002), while a negative correlation was found between their knowledge and attitudes (r = -0.156, P = 0.035) towards PU prevention. Also, the results showed a positive correlation between the years of ICU work experience among nurses and their knowledge of PU prevention (r = 0.159, P = 0.032). The same result was also observed for the overall years of working experience, although this correlation was marginally significant (r = 0.145, P = 0.051). Based on a one-way ANOVA, there was a direct relationship between knowledge and income, and knowledge were higher in high-income nurses (P = 0.017). Table 1: Means, Standard Deviations, and correlations among study variables. Descriptive statistics Correlational analysis Possible range Observed range Mean (SD) Knowledge Attitude Practice Knowledge 0-100 39.02-100 70.57 (13.51) 1 Attitude 0-100 32.69-67.31 52.82 (6.16) -0.156 1 Practice 0-44 10-37 22.44 (5.20) -0.119 0.232 1 Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that the KAP levels of Iranian ICU nurses regarding PU prevention were desirable, positive, and relatively desirable. Therefore, it is recommended that nurse managers and policy makers address the major barriers and related factors that may affect ICU nurses' practices in preventing PUs. References Coyer F, Labeau S, Blot S. (2022) Preventing pressure injuries among patients in the intensive care unit: insights gained. Intensive Care Medicine. 48(12):1787-1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06838-3. Ghorbani Vajargah P, Mollaei A, Falakdami A, Takasi P, Moosazadeh Z, Esmaeili S, Emami Zeydi A, Karkhah S. (2023) A systematic review of nurses' practice and related factors toward pressure ulcer prevention. International Wound Journal. 20(6):2386-2401. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14062. Sohrabi Akhkand S, Seidi J, Ebadi A, Ghanei Gheshlagh R. (2020) Prevalence of pressure ulcer in Iran’s intensive care units: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Nursing Practice Today. 7(1) doi.org/10.18502/npt.v7i1.2296 Wu J, Wang B, Zhu L, Jia X. (2022) Nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool. Frontiers in Public Health. 10:964680. doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964680.

International Journal of Critical CareVol. 18(4)
Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iranshahr University (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.