Expert System for Diagnosing Dengue Fever with Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Dempster Shafer Methods

An expert system for diagnosing dengue fever (DF) using a comparison of the Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer methods aims to provide a solution to assist medical personnel in diagnosing this disease. Dengue fever is a disease caused by the dengue virus infection through the bite of Aedes mosquitoes. It has symptoms similar to other diseases and requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. The Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer methods were chosen because both have different approaches to handling uncertainty and imprecise information. The Naive Bayes method is a probability-based classification that assumes independence between features. Meanwhile, Dempster Shafer is an approach to handling uncertainty. Therefore, comparing Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer allows for classification with structured and fairly straightforward data, offering accuracy and flexibility in dealing with uncertainty. Applying this expert system with these methods can help in the faster and more accurate diagnosis of DF and provide better recommendations in situations where the available data is incomplete or ambiguous. From the test data calculations, the two methods show that the Naive Bayes method has a higher percentage value of 93%, while Dempster Shafer has 86%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Science and Information Technology
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.691
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert System for Diagnosing Dengue Fever with Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Dempster Shafer Methods

Yesy Afrillia, Nurdin Nurdin, Neli Susanti
1 links
International Journal of Engineering Science and Information Technology
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

Expert System for Diagnosing Dengue Fever with Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Dempster Shafer Methods

Yesy Afrillia, Nurdin Nurdin, Neli Susanti
article en

Abstract

An expert system for diagnosing dengue fever (DF) using a comparison of the Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer methods aims to provide a solution to assist medical personnel in diagnosing this disease. Dengue fever is a disease caused by the dengue virus infection through the bite of Aedes mosquitoes. It has symptoms similar to other diseases and requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. The Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer methods were chosen because both have different approaches to handling uncertainty and imprecise information. The Naive Bayes method is a probability-based classification that assumes independence between features. Meanwhile, Dempster Shafer is an approach to handling uncertainty. Therefore, comparing Naive Bayes and Dempster Shafer allows for classification with structured and fairly straightforward data, offering accuracy and flexibility in dealing with uncertainty. Applying this expert system with these methods can help in the faster and more accurate diagnosis of DF and provide better recommendations in situations where the available data is incomplete or ambiguous. From the test data calculations, the two methods show that the Naive Bayes method has a higher percentage value of 93%, while Dempster Shafer has 86%.

International Journal of Engineering Science and Information TechnologyVol. 5(1)
Malikussaleh University (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.