Understanding Professional Learning Practices of Engineering Educators: Insights From the SPARK-ENG Program

To meet our institutional demands for enhancing engineering education, we developed a professional learning program to comprehensively support our engineering educators at our university. In this study, we investigated participants’ authentic professional learning experiences that emerged from their engagement with the program through interpretive inquiry, framed by complexity theory. Data analysis revealed that the program enabled participants to experience four-layered learning practices that functioned as learning systems—an evolving learning process. This process empowered them to transition from knowledge recipients to active and authentic educators. Our program provides a valuable reference for creating supportive environments for engineering educators’ professional learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i11.7449
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Professional Learning Practices of Engineering Educators: Insights From the SPARK-ENG Program

P. Janelle McFeetors, Kerry Rose, Mijung Kim, Xiong Wang
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Understanding Professional Learning Practices of Engineering Educators: Insights From the SPARK-ENG Program

P. Janelle McFeetors, Kerry Rose, Mijung Kim, Xiong Wang
article en

Abstract

To meet our institutional demands for enhancing engineering education, we developed a professional learning program to comprehensively support our engineering educators at our university. In this study, we investigated participants’ authentic professional learning experiences that emerged from their engagement with the program through interpretive inquiry, framed by complexity theory. Data analysis revealed that the program enabled participants to experience four-layered learning practices that functioned as learning systems—an evolving learning process. This process empowered them to transition from knowledge recipients to active and authentic educators. Our program provides a valuable reference for creating supportive environments for engineering educators’ professional learning.

Journal of Higher Education Theory and PracticeVol. 24(11)
University of Alberta (CA)
University of Alberta
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.