COHORT DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT EXCHANGE: INSIGHTS FROM DIVERSE AGING IN THE US

Abstract Background Studies from Europe indicate an increase in social support exchanges among older adults, but whether this trend also applies to the US and the perception of these exchanges as positive or negative remains unclear. Furthermore, it’s uncertain if these changes also benefit those that face disadvantage, such as low income and racial minority groups, especially when considering intersecting factors. Methods This study employs cohort-sequential analysis of Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data collected from 2008 to 2022 in 8 waves to investigate cohort differences in positive and negative social support exchanges among older adults in the United States. It focuses on the influences of cohort, race, and income on social support dynamics, employing data from the psycho-social questionnaire. Results Despite a general increase in positive support exchanges, disparities in social support exchange persist based on race and socioeconomic status. Individuals with lower incomes and from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disproportionately more negative social support exchanges, indicating persistent inequalities. Discussion Recognizing the complexities of social support exchanges, particularly in relation to cohort, race, and socioeconomic status, is crucial for policymakers and healthcare professionals. Tailored interventions are essential to address disparities and promote equitable aging outcomes and overall well-being among older adults in the US.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0603
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COHORT DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT EXCHANGE: INSIGHTS FROM DIVERSE AGING IN THE US

Jacqui Smith, Oliver Huxhold, Bianca Suanet
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

COHORT DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT EXCHANGE: INSIGHTS FROM DIVERSE AGING IN THE US

Jacqui Smith, Oliver Huxhold, Bianca Suanet
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies from Europe indicate an increase in social support exchanges among older adults, but whether this trend also applies to the US and the perception of these exchanges as positive or negative remains unclear. Furthermore, it’s uncertain if these changes also benefit those that face disadvantage, such as low income and racial minority groups, especially when considering intersecting factors. Methods This study employs cohort-sequential analysis of Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data collected from 2008 to 2022 in 8 waves to investigate cohort differences in positive and negative social support exchanges among older adults in the United States. It focuses on the influences of cohort, race, and income on social support dynamics, employing data from the psycho-social questionnaire. Results Despite a general increase in positive support exchanges, disparities in social support exchange persist based on race and socioeconomic status. Individuals with lower incomes and from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disproportionately more negative social support exchanges, indicating persistent inequalities. Discussion Recognizing the complexities of social support exchanges, particularly in relation to cohort, race, and socioeconomic status, is crucial for policymakers and healthcare professionals. Tailored interventions are essential to address disparities and promote equitable aging outcomes and overall well-being among older adults in the US.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Michigan (US), German Centre of Gerontology (DE), Michigan United (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.