SUPPORTIVE HOME FEATURES AS PROACTIVE/REACTIVE ASSOCIATES OF DAILY FUNCTIONING IN OLDER ADULTS

Abstract Supportive home features (SHF) include attributes of living spaces meant to help people overcome physical limitations that may be barriers to living independently. Evidence suggests that SHFs, including home modifications (HM), may help older adults to age in place at home. However, real-life implementation of HMs is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify associations between functioning in daily-living activities and the presence of SHFs. We analyzed two waves (2011 and 2015) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to examine the directionality of this relationship. SHFs were operationalized using indicators of home accessibility (e.g., presence of a bedroom, kitchen, and full bathroom with a shower or tub on the same floor). HMs were operationalized based on whether bathroom fixtures were modified to accommodate disability with features such as grab bars. Daily activities were assessed using measures of activities of daily living (ADL; e.g., dressing) and instrumental ADLs (IADL; e.g., preparing a meal). Changes in ADL/IADL functioning and SHF/HM variables were assessed over the 5-year period. Regression models also included covariates for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, mobility functioning, and participation. Results show that, whereas ADL limitations statistically predict SHF/HM outcomes, the implementation of SHF/HMs does not predict any ADL/IADL outcomes. These findings suggest that in real life, older adults implement SHF/HMs reactively in response to functional needs, as opposed to planning proactively to meet needs in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0008
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SUPPORTIVE HOME FEATURES AS PROACTIVE/REACTIVE ASSOCIATES OF DAILY FUNCTIONING IN OLDER ADULTS

Daniel Barbakoff, Bernard A. Steinman, Kristen Glennie
Innovation in Aging
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

SUPPORTIVE HOME FEATURES AS PROACTIVE/REACTIVE ASSOCIATES OF DAILY FUNCTIONING IN OLDER ADULTS

Daniel Barbakoff, Bernard A. Steinman, Kristen Glennie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Supportive home features (SHF) include attributes of living spaces meant to help people overcome physical limitations that may be barriers to living independently. Evidence suggests that SHFs, including home modifications (HM), may help older adults to age in place at home. However, real-life implementation of HMs is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify associations between functioning in daily-living activities and the presence of SHFs. We analyzed two waves (2011 and 2015) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to examine the directionality of this relationship. SHFs were operationalized using indicators of home accessibility (e.g., presence of a bedroom, kitchen, and full bathroom with a shower or tub on the same floor). HMs were operationalized based on whether bathroom fixtures were modified to accommodate disability with features such as grab bars. Daily activities were assessed using measures of activities of daily living (ADL; e.g., dressing) and instrumental ADLs (IADL; e.g., preparing a meal). Changes in ADL/IADL functioning and SHF/HM variables were assessed over the 5-year period. Regression models also included covariates for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, mobility functioning, and participation. Results show that, whereas ADL limitations statistically predict SHF/HM outcomes, the implementation of SHF/HMs does not predict any ADL/IADL outcomes. These findings suggest that in real life, older adults implement SHF/HMs reactively in response to functional needs, as opposed to planning proactively to meet needs in the future.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Wyoming (US), Cornell University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SUPPORTIVE HOME FEATURES AS PROACTIVE/REACTIVE ASSOCIATES OF DAILY FUNCTIONING IN OLDER ADULTS — Daniel Barbakoff, Bernard A. Steinman, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS