INEQUALITIES IN OLDER ADULTS’ LIFELONG LEARNING: HOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS SHAPES PARTICIPATION AND BENEFITS

Abstract Although lifelong learning has been increasingly utilized to promote active ageing, research increasingly suggests that older adults with lower socio-economic statuses (SES) may face unique barriers to participation in these programs. Simultaneously, we know little about whether SES moderates the well-being benefits of lifelong learning programs. Using two waves of data (2016-17; 2019) from a nationally representative sample of Singaporeans aged 60 and above (n = 2,508), this study investigates whether older adults’ SES shapes their participation and benefits reaped from lifelong learning programs. Firstly, we used a multinomial logistic regression model to examine the relationships between SES and participation in job-related and nonjob-related lifelong learning programs. Secondly, we used lagged dependent variable regression analyses with inverse probability weight adjustments to examine whether SES moderated the relationship between lifelong learning participation and quality of life, while addressing potential selection biases into lifelong learning participation. Findings indicate that older adults with higher educational attainment and occupational prestige had greater participation in both job- and nonjob-related lifelong learning. Moderation analyses further showed that the effects of nonjob-related learning on quality of life were only significant for those with lower SES. In summary, these findings suggest that although lower-SES older adults benefit more from participation in lifelong learning programs, they are also less likely to participate in such programs. Results highlight the need to make programs more accessible to lower-SES older adults. Future research should continue to investigate the mechanisms through which SES moderates the benefits of lifelong learning for well-being outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0093
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INEQUALITIES IN OLDER ADULTS’ LIFELONG LEARNING: HOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS SHAPES PARTICIPATION AND BENEFITS

Jeun Kee Chua, Sangyoon Chin, Rahul Malhotra, Shannon Ang et al.
Innovation in Aging
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

INEQUALITIES IN OLDER ADULTS’ LIFELONG LEARNING: HOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS SHAPES PARTICIPATION AND BENEFITS

Jeun Kee Chua, Sangyoon Chin, Rahul Malhotra, Shannon Ang, Nathan Widjaja
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although lifelong learning has been increasingly utilized to promote active ageing, research increasingly suggests that older adults with lower socio-economic statuses (SES) may face unique barriers to participation in these programs. Simultaneously, we know little about whether SES moderates the well-being benefits of lifelong learning programs. Using two waves of data (2016-17; 2019) from a nationally representative sample of Singaporeans aged 60 and above (n = 2,508), this study investigates whether older adults’ SES shapes their participation and benefits reaped from lifelong learning programs. Firstly, we used a multinomial logistic regression model to examine the relationships between SES and participation in job-related and nonjob-related lifelong learning programs. Secondly, we used lagged dependent variable regression analyses with inverse probability weight adjustments to examine whether SES moderated the relationship between lifelong learning participation and quality of life, while addressing potential selection biases into lifelong learning participation. Findings indicate that older adults with higher educational attainment and occupational prestige had greater participation in both job- and nonjob-related lifelong learning. Moderation analyses further showed that the effects of nonjob-related learning on quality of life were only significant for those with lower SES. In summary, these findings suggest that although lower-SES older adults benefit more from participation in lifelong learning programs, they are also less likely to participate in such programs. Results highlight the need to make programs more accessible to lower-SES older adults. Future research should continue to investigate the mechanisms through which SES moderates the benefits of lifelong learning for well-being outcomes.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.