INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AMONG US OLDER IMMIGRANTS: WHAT ARE THE ODDS?

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV), a subtype of domestic violence, is a pervasive global problem with life-long impacts. Among U.S. older adults, the prevalence of psychological IPV (PAIPV) is 2.1%, and physical IPV (PVIPV) is 0.8%. Sadly, underrepresented individuals, including immigrants, have less access to resources that can serve as IPV protective factors. Due to the growing immigrant and older population in the U.S., it is essential to identify their unique IPV characteristics. Objective and Method: This study used and analyzed the latest publicly available cross-sectional data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2016/17 (n=10,957) of a selected national sample of English and Spanish-speaking immigrants (n=1,121) to identify their odds of experiencing PAIPV or PVIPV-based on identified demographic characteristics, including age. Additionally, of interest and identified was the prevalence of PAIPV and PVIPV among older immigrants 65+ years (n=124). Results Contrary to the literature, among older immigrants aged 65+ years, PVIPV (10.7%) was more prevalent than PAIPV (9.1%). In an adjusted regression model for PAIPV at 95% CI, Spanish and/or English-speaking immigrants aged 65+ years were 3.147 [1.065, 9.299] significantly more likely to experience PAIPV than younger immigrants. However, age was not significantly associated with PVIPV. To conclude, IPV presents itself in unique etiologies among older immigrants. This study is an initial step toward using national data to understand IPV better for a combined male and female sample of older immigrants in the U.S. Further discussed will be the distinct differences in the study findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.1403
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AMONG US OLDER IMMIGRANTS: WHAT ARE THE ODDS?

Rujeko O. Machinga-Asaolu, Yanghyun Park, Kathryn Showalter
Innovation in Aging
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AMONG US OLDER IMMIGRANTS: WHAT ARE THE ODDS?

Rujeko O. Machinga-Asaolu, Yanghyun Park, Kathryn Showalter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV), a subtype of domestic violence, is a pervasive global problem with life-long impacts. Among U.S. older adults, the prevalence of psychological IPV (PAIPV) is 2.1%, and physical IPV (PVIPV) is 0.8%. Sadly, underrepresented individuals, including immigrants, have less access to resources that can serve as IPV protective factors. Due to the growing immigrant and older population in the U.S., it is essential to identify their unique IPV characteristics. Objective and Method: This study used and analyzed the latest publicly available cross-sectional data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2016/17 (n=10,957) of a selected national sample of English and Spanish-speaking immigrants (n=1,121) to identify their odds of experiencing PAIPV or PVIPV-based on identified demographic characteristics, including age. Additionally, of interest and identified was the prevalence of PAIPV and PVIPV among older immigrants 65+ years (n=124). Results Contrary to the literature, among older immigrants aged 65+ years, PVIPV (10.7%) was more prevalent than PAIPV (9.1%). In an adjusted regression model for PAIPV at 95% CI, Spanish and/or English-speaking immigrants aged 65+ years were 3.147 [1.065, 9.299] significantly more likely to experience PAIPV than younger immigrants. However, age was not significantly associated with PVIPV. To conclude, IPV presents itself in unique etiologies among older immigrants. This study is an initial step toward using national data to understand IPV better for a combined male and female sample of older immigrants in the U.S. Further discussed will be the distinct differences in the study findings.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Kentucky (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AMONG US OLDER IMMIGRANTS: WHAT ARE THE ODDS? — Rujeko O. Machinga-Asaolu, Yanghyun Park, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS