IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED PALLIATIVE CARE: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW

Abstract Community-based palliative care (CBPC) models, which include palliative care (PC) delivered in outpatient clinics and homes, improve quality of life for people living with serious illness and their care partners. CBPC access has been expanding across the United States, with the goal of delivering PC earlier in the trajectory of serious illness care. This systematic scoping review aimed to summarize provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to CBPC program implementation. MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative research published between 1/1/2010 and 1/9/2024 that included provider perspectives on CBPC, excluding hospice or end-of-life care. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted themes. Framework synthesis was used to categorize themes into provider, organization, and environmental levels according to the PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model) framework. Thirty-five articles were included, varying by providers (PC providers, referring providers, administrators) and practice settings (PC clinic, specialty-embedded PC clinic, home). At the provider level, misperceptions of PC by referring providers, poor inter-provider communication, and unclear roles were perceived barriers to CBPC. Conversely, multidisciplinary PC teams, referring provider PC education, and collaboration were perceived facilitators. At the organizational level, time constraints were perceived barriers while leadership buy-in, shared medical records, and colocation of PC into specialty clinics were perceived facilitators. At the environment level, limited PC workforce and PC reimbursement were perceived barriers. Few articles addressed cultural sensitivity; standardized performance data; and social needs resources. Successful CBPC implementation requires addressing factors at the provider, organizational, and environmental levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0753
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED PALLIATIVE CARE: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW

Lesley A. Skalla, Jessica Ma, Brystana G. Kaufman, Haripriya Dukkipati et al.
1 citations
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
0.54
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED PALLIATIVE CARE: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW

Lesley A. Skalla, Jessica Ma, Brystana G. Kaufman, Haripriya Dukkipati, Judith B. Vick, Dorian Ho, Nicole Dissault
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Community-based palliative care (CBPC) models, which include palliative care (PC) delivered in outpatient clinics and homes, improve quality of life for people living with serious illness and their care partners. CBPC access has been expanding across the United States, with the goal of delivering PC earlier in the trajectory of serious illness care. This systematic scoping review aimed to summarize provider perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to CBPC program implementation. MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative research published between 1/1/2010 and 1/9/2024 that included provider perspectives on CBPC, excluding hospice or end-of-life care. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted themes. Framework synthesis was used to categorize themes into provider, organization, and environmental levels according to the PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model) framework. Thirty-five articles were included, varying by providers (PC providers, referring providers, administrators) and practice settings (PC clinic, specialty-embedded PC clinic, home). At the provider level, misperceptions of PC by referring providers, poor inter-provider communication, and unclear roles were perceived barriers to CBPC. Conversely, multidisciplinary PC teams, referring provider PC education, and collaboration were perceived facilitators. At the organizational level, time constraints were perceived barriers while leadership buy-in, shared medical records, and colocation of PC into specialty clinics were perceived facilitators. At the environment level, limited PC workforce and PC reimbursement were perceived barriers. Few articles addressed cultural sensitivity; standardized performance data; and social needs resources. Successful CBPC implementation requires addressing factors at the provider, organizational, and environmental levels.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Duke University (US), Providence College (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.