UNDERSTANDING PRISM ACCEPTANCE THROUGH QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASURES

Abstract Long-term adoption of technology is influenced both by the design of the technology itself as well by the users’ attitudes towards the technology. Technology acceptance models have long indicated that individual differences in perceptions of ease of use and perceptions of usefulness are critical predictors of acceptance and use. Additional predictive factors include perceived enjoyment, facilitating conditions (e.g., instructional materials, social support), demographics (e.g., age, sex) and psychographics (e.g., personality, technology readiness). For PRISM 1.0 and PRISM 2.0 we implemented mixed methods to assess technology acceptance factors. We adapted standard survey measures of technology acceptance that were administered at baseline and after extended system use. We developed an interview that was administered at the end of the study to explore usage patterns, preferences, facilitators and barriers. Data from the technology acceptance assessments from PRISM 1.0 informed redesign decisions for the PRISM 2 system. We will present an overview of the quantitative and qualitative data to illustrate the value of the mixed methods approach and to provide insights about acceptance and adoption of novel technology system to older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0041
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UNDERSTANDING PRISM ACCEPTANCE THROUGH QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASURES

Tracy L. Mitzner, Neil Charness, Walter R. Boot, Sara J. Czaja et al.
Innovation in Aging
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

UNDERSTANDING PRISM ACCEPTANCE THROUGH QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASURES

Tracy L. Mitzner, Neil Charness, Walter R. Boot, Sara J. Czaja, Wendy A. Rogers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Long-term adoption of technology is influenced both by the design of the technology itself as well by the users’ attitudes towards the technology. Technology acceptance models have long indicated that individual differences in perceptions of ease of use and perceptions of usefulness are critical predictors of acceptance and use. Additional predictive factors include perceived enjoyment, facilitating conditions (e.g., instructional materials, social support), demographics (e.g., age, sex) and psychographics (e.g., personality, technology readiness). For PRISM 1.0 and PRISM 2.0 we implemented mixed methods to assess technology acceptance factors. We adapted standard survey measures of technology acceptance that were administered at baseline and after extended system use. We developed an interview that was administered at the end of the study to explore usage patterns, preferences, facilitators and barriers. Data from the technology acceptance assessments from PRISM 1.0 informed redesign decisions for the PRISM 2 system. We will present an overview of the quantitative and qualitative data to illustrate the value of the mixed methods approach and to provide insights about acceptance and adoption of novel technology system to older adults.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Florida State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Cornell University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

UNDERSTANDING PRISM ACCEPTANCE THROUGH QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASURES — Tracy L. Mitzner, Neil Charness, et al. · Innovation in Aging (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS