EFFECTS OF MINORITY AND CAREGIVING STRESS ON THE HEALTH OF BI+ INFORMAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS

Abstract Bi+ people (e.g., bisexual, pansexual) are more likely to experience poor physical and mental health compared with monosexual minority (i.e., gay[G], lesbian[L]) people. These poor health outcomes stem from minority stress related to sexual minority status. Due to minority and caregiver stress, LGB+ people providing care to someone with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are more likely to have worse health than their straight counterparts. Little is known about how minority and caregiver stress affect the health of bi+ ADRD caregivers versus monosexual minority ADRD caregivers. Data from ADRD caregivers (bi+, n=125; gay/lesbian, n=161) were used to examine associations between minority stress, caregiver stress and overall health and if associations differed among bi+ and gay/lesbian ADRD caregivers. Multivariable regression, adjusting for demographics, was used to investigate if sexual orientation moderated the association between minority/caregiver stress variables and overall health. All minority stressors and two caregiving stressors (caring for spouse/care recipient’s level of independence) were associated with health. In our adjusted model, lifetime victimization, day-to-day discrimination, and caring for spouse/partner, moderated the association between sexual orientation and overall health. As lifetime victimization scores increased, bi+ health decreased while monosexual minority health increased. Caring for a spouse/partner, protective for both groups, had a greater effect on health for monosexual minorities. Higher day-to-day discrimination scores predicted worse health for both groups, but the magnitude was greater for monosexual minorities. Qualitative inquiries can illuminate underlying mechanisms for this phenomenon, informing interventions and policy aimed at supporting health and well-being of bi+ ADRD caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0589
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF MINORITY AND CAREGIVING STRESS ON THE HEALTH OF BI+ INFORMAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS

Jason D. Flatt, Ethan C. Cicero, Joel G. Anderson, Jordan Pelkmans et al.
Innovation in Aging
Korean Urban and Social Studies
article

EFFECTS OF MINORITY AND CAREGIVING STRESS ON THE HEALTH OF BI+ INFORMAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS

Jason D. Flatt, Ethan C. Cicero, Joel G. Anderson, Jordan Pelkmans, Krystal Kittle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bi+ people (e.g., bisexual, pansexual) are more likely to experience poor physical and mental health compared with monosexual minority (i.e., gay[G], lesbian[L]) people. These poor health outcomes stem from minority stress related to sexual minority status. Due to minority and caregiver stress, LGB+ people providing care to someone with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are more likely to have worse health than their straight counterparts. Little is known about how minority and caregiver stress affect the health of bi+ ADRD caregivers versus monosexual minority ADRD caregivers. Data from ADRD caregivers (bi+, n=125; gay/lesbian, n=161) were used to examine associations between minority stress, caregiver stress and overall health and if associations differed among bi+ and gay/lesbian ADRD caregivers. Multivariable regression, adjusting for demographics, was used to investigate if sexual orientation moderated the association between minority/caregiver stress variables and overall health. All minority stressors and two caregiving stressors (caring for spouse/care recipient’s level of independence) were associated with health. In our adjusted model, lifetime victimization, day-to-day discrimination, and caring for spouse/partner, moderated the association between sexual orientation and overall health. As lifetime victimization scores increased, bi+ health decreased while monosexual minority health increased. Caring for a spouse/partner, protective for both groups, had a greater effect on health for monosexual minorities. Higher day-to-day discrimination scores predicted worse health for both groups, but the magnitude was greater for monosexual minorities. Qualitative inquiries can illuminate underlying mechanisms for this phenomenon, informing interventions and policy aimed at supporting health and well-being of bi+ ADRD caregivers.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Emory University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Tennessee System (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Quincy University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.