RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY ENVIRONMENTS OF US OLDER ADULTS

Abstract Living in neighborhoods with diverse amenity environments, including a variety of facilities and services, may impact the health and well-being of older residents by providing increased access to essential services, fostering social networks, and building social capital within communities. Such environments, however, may not be uniformly experienced across racial/ethnic groups, potentially creating and reinforcing racial/ethnic disparities in aging-related outcomes. Our study provides rich descriptive information on the distribution of neighborhood amenities of U.S. adults ages 50 and older across and by different racial and ethnic groups. We link census tract-level data on amenities from the National Neighborhood Data Archive to population-level data from the Health and Retirement Study for the 2004-2016 data waves (N=26,194 respondents, 107,254 observations). Neighborhood amenity diversity was measured as a total amenity diversity score (range: 0-119), calculated by top-coding (at two) and summing counts of amenities across four categories: food (e.g., restaurants, grocery stores), retail (e.g., clothing, convenience stores), general services (e.g., banks, gyms), and civic services (e.g., senior facilities, community centers). On average, Black (mean=40.4, SE=0.80) and Hispanic (mean=43.2, SE=0.97) older adults lived in neighborhoods with significantly lower total amenity diversity scores compared to their White counterparts (mean=46.8, SE=0.49). In linear regression models, adjusting for clustering at the individual and tract levels and including demographic and socioeconomic variables, these differences remained significant for Black (b=-7.1, p< 0.001), but not Hispanic (b=-2.0, p=0.062) older adults. Finally, supplementary analyses stratifying by urbanicity and examining racial/ethnic differences in category-specific amenities revealed similar patterns as the total amenity diversity score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0018
Primary Topic
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY ENVIRONMENTS OF US OLDER ADULTS

Calley Fisk, Jennifer Ailshire, Hyungmin Cha, Yeon Jin Choi et al.
Innovation in Aging
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
article

RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY ENVIRONMENTS OF US OLDER ADULTS

Calley Fisk, Jennifer Ailshire, Hyungmin Cha, Yeon Jin Choi, Eun‐Young Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Living in neighborhoods with diverse amenity environments, including a variety of facilities and services, may impact the health and well-being of older residents by providing increased access to essential services, fostering social networks, and building social capital within communities. Such environments, however, may not be uniformly experienced across racial/ethnic groups, potentially creating and reinforcing racial/ethnic disparities in aging-related outcomes. Our study provides rich descriptive information on the distribution of neighborhood amenities of U.S. adults ages 50 and older across and by different racial and ethnic groups. We link census tract-level data on amenities from the National Neighborhood Data Archive to population-level data from the Health and Retirement Study for the 2004-2016 data waves (N=26,194 respondents, 107,254 observations). Neighborhood amenity diversity was measured as a total amenity diversity score (range: 0-119), calculated by top-coding (at two) and summing counts of amenities across four categories: food (e.g., restaurants, grocery stores), retail (e.g., clothing, convenience stores), general services (e.g., banks, gyms), and civic services (e.g., senior facilities, community centers). On average, Black (mean=40.4, SE=0.80) and Hispanic (mean=43.2, SE=0.97) older adults lived in neighborhoods with significantly lower total amenity diversity scores compared to their White counterparts (mean=46.8, SE=0.49). In linear regression models, adjusting for clustering at the individual and tract levels and including demographic and socioeconomic variables, these differences remained significant for Black (b=-7.1, p< 0.001), but not Hispanic (b=-2.0, p=0.062) older adults. Finally, supplementary analyses stratifying by urbanicity and examining racial/ethnic differences in category-specific amenities revealed similar patterns as the total amenity diversity score.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Southern California (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.