TRENDS IN MEDICARE BENEFICIARY PAYMENTS FOR NONHOSPICE SERVICES DURING HOSPICE ELECTIONS

Abstract Hospice election marks a shift towards palliative objectives, although beneficiaries retain curative coverage for unrelated (non-terminal) conditions. Little is known about beneficiary cost sharing for these services. Using Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Medicare claims, we cross-referenced beneficiaries’ hospice and non-hospice services claims’ dates. For overlapping claims, we totaled beneficiaries’ liability payments (coinsurance and deductibles) by year, claim type, and ICD-10 code. We used linear regression analysis to assess trends with beneficiary and hospice characteristics. We also compared beneficiary payments to Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Hospice score star ratings. In FY2022, Medicare paid $931.1 million for non-hospice services during hospice election, for which beneficiaries were collectively billed $206.8 million (18.2%), with 45.0% of hospice beneficiaries paying some amount. The majority was for services on or after the 60th day from hospice admission. Part B accounted for most (88.9%) of the total beneficiary payments. Pressure ulcers, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and COVID-19 were associated with the greatest payment amounts. Beneficiary payments were largest among beneficiaries black or Hispanic, or younger, or terminal heart disease, or dual-eligible for Medicaid, or in a nursing facility, or from a newer, for-profit, or southern hospice. Daily payment rates were $0.32 at the 10th percentile and $3.31 at the 90th percentile. Daily payment rates were $2.17 at CAHPS one-star hospices vs. $1.00 at five-star hospices. CMS should monitor these trends to ensure that vulnerable beneficiaries are not unfairly impacted and evaluate whether beneficiary payments are a useful hospice quality indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0751
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TRENDS IN MEDICARE BENEFICIARY PAYMENTS FOR NONHOSPICE SERVICES DURING HOSPICE ELECTIONS

Michael Plotzke, Thomas Christian
Innovation in Aging
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

TRENDS IN MEDICARE BENEFICIARY PAYMENTS FOR NONHOSPICE SERVICES DURING HOSPICE ELECTIONS

Michael Plotzke, Thomas Christian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hospice election marks a shift towards palliative objectives, although beneficiaries retain curative coverage for unrelated (non-terminal) conditions. Little is known about beneficiary cost sharing for these services. Using Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Medicare claims, we cross-referenced beneficiaries’ hospice and non-hospice services claims’ dates. For overlapping claims, we totaled beneficiaries’ liability payments (coinsurance and deductibles) by year, claim type, and ICD-10 code. We used linear regression analysis to assess trends with beneficiary and hospice characteristics. We also compared beneficiary payments to Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Hospice score star ratings. In FY2022, Medicare paid $931.1 million for non-hospice services during hospice election, for which beneficiaries were collectively billed $206.8 million (18.2%), with 45.0% of hospice beneficiaries paying some amount. The majority was for services on or after the 60th day from hospice admission. Part B accounted for most (88.9%) of the total beneficiary payments. Pressure ulcers, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and COVID-19 were associated with the greatest payment amounts. Beneficiary payments were largest among beneficiaries black or Hispanic, or younger, or terminal heart disease, or dual-eligible for Medicaid, or in a nursing facility, or from a newer, for-profit, or southern hospice. Daily payment rates were $0.32 at the 10th percentile and $3.31 at the 90th percentile. Daily payment rates were $2.17 at CAHPS one-star hospices vs. $1.00 at five-star hospices. CMS should monitor these trends to ensure that vulnerable beneficiaries are not unfairly impacted and evaluate whether beneficiary payments are a useful hospice quality indicator.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Abt Global (United States) (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

TRENDS IN MEDICARE BENEFICIARY PAYMENTS FOR NONHOSPICE SERVICES DURING HOSPICE ELECTIONS — Michael Plotzke, Thomas Christian · Innovation in Aging (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS