USING INFORMATICS AND GENERATIVE AI TO SUPPORT OLDER ADULTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF LAB TEST RESULTS

Abstract Viewing laboratory test results is the most frequently used function of patient portals, but lab results can be confusing for patients. In this project, we aim to gain insights into older adults’ challenges in understanding lab test results. To achieve the goals, we first conducted an online survey with 276 patients with one or more chronic conditions. We found that younger adults and patients who had never used patient portals had significantly lower lab test comprehension scores compared to older adults, and those with higher numeracy or with no multiple chronic conditions. Even though older adults performed better on lab test comprehension tests, most reported they have difficulty understanding lab results online and prefer that their doctors explain these to them. In the second study, we selected 53 lab results-related questions from a community Q&A website, Yahoo! Answers, and evaluated the answers to these questions from four generative large language models. We utilized a ChatGPT-based evaluator Win Rate to judge whether a target model has higher quality in terms of relevance, correctness, helpfulness, and safety than the baseline model. Then, we performed a manual evaluation with medical experts for all the responses to seven selected questions on the same four aspects. The results of Win Rate and medical expert evaluation both showed that GPT-4’s responses achieved better scores than all the other LLM responses from LLaMa 2, ORCA_mini, and MedAlpaca and human responses on all four aspects. However, LLM responses occasionally suffer from incorrect statements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0351
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

USING INFORMATICS AND GENERATIVE AI TO SUPPORT OLDER ADULTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF LAB TEST RESULTS

Zhe He, Balu Bhasuran, Karim Hanna, Shubo Tian et al.
Innovation in Aging
AI and HR Technologies
article

USING INFORMATICS AND GENERATIVE AI TO SUPPORT OLDER ADULTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF LAB TEST RESULTS

Zhe He, Balu Bhasuran, Karim Hanna, Shubo Tian, Zhiyong Lu, Qiao Jin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Viewing laboratory test results is the most frequently used function of patient portals, but lab results can be confusing for patients. In this project, we aim to gain insights into older adults’ challenges in understanding lab test results. To achieve the goals, we first conducted an online survey with 276 patients with one or more chronic conditions. We found that younger adults and patients who had never used patient portals had significantly lower lab test comprehension scores compared to older adults, and those with higher numeracy or with no multiple chronic conditions. Even though older adults performed better on lab test comprehension tests, most reported they have difficulty understanding lab results online and prefer that their doctors explain these to them. In the second study, we selected 53 lab results-related questions from a community Q&A website, Yahoo! Answers, and evaluated the answers to these questions from four generative large language models. We utilized a ChatGPT-based evaluator Win Rate to judge whether a target model has higher quality in terms of relevance, correctness, helpfulness, and safety than the baseline model. Then, we performed a manual evaluation with medical experts for all the responses to seven selected questions on the same four aspects. The results of Win Rate and medical expert evaluation both showed that GPT-4’s responses achieved better scores than all the other LLM responses from LLaMa 2, ORCA_mini, and MedAlpaca and human responses on all four aspects. However, LLM responses occasionally suffer from incorrect statements.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Florida State University (US), National Institutes of Health (US), University of South Florida (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
AI and HR Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.