UNDERSTANDING VOTING TRENDS AMONG AGING AMERICANS

Abstract The right to vote, also known as “the franchise”, is a fundamental right of United States (US) citizens, and is essential to preserve the democratic republic of the US. However, voting often requires significant planning, time and effort, and there are considerable and persistent challenges and threats to voting for several demographic groups in the US, including older adults. In this analysis, we will examine voting trends in this population in four recent general Presidential Elections (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020) using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Specifically, we will examine self-reported voting percentages among noninstitutionalized older US adults (ages 60 years or older) who report having disabilities compared to older adults without disabilities, after adjustment for demographic variables. In addition, we will compare engagement in early voting, as well as voting in person or via mail, among older adults with and without disabilities. Lastly, we will examine whether these results are moderated by race, gender or other demographic factors (e.g. education). Results will be discussed in the context of the extant literature, as well as the history of legislative facilitators and barriers to voting for American adults with disabilities. Finally, we discuss voting trends among adults with disabilities for the 2024 Presidential Election, and we provide suggestions for future education and research and additional facilitators to enhance voting rates for older Americans with or without disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0307
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UNDERSTANDING VOTING TRENDS AMONG AGING AMERICANS

Goldie S. Byrd, Capri G. Foy, TanYa M. Gwathmey, Kelvin Williams et al.
Innovation in Aging
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

UNDERSTANDING VOTING TRENDS AMONG AGING AMERICANS

Goldie S. Byrd, Capri G. Foy, TanYa M. Gwathmey, Kelvin Williams, Allison Caban-Hol, Patricia Smyre
article en

Abstract

Abstract The right to vote, also known as “the franchise”, is a fundamental right of United States (US) citizens, and is essential to preserve the democratic republic of the US. However, voting often requires significant planning, time and effort, and there are considerable and persistent challenges and threats to voting for several demographic groups in the US, including older adults. In this analysis, we will examine voting trends in this population in four recent general Presidential Elections (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020) using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Specifically, we will examine self-reported voting percentages among noninstitutionalized older US adults (ages 60 years or older) who report having disabilities compared to older adults without disabilities, after adjustment for demographic variables. In addition, we will compare engagement in early voting, as well as voting in person or via mail, among older adults with and without disabilities. Lastly, we will examine whether these results are moderated by race, gender or other demographic factors (e.g. education). Results will be discussed in the context of the extant literature, as well as the history of legislative facilitators and barriers to voting for American adults with disabilities. Finally, we discuss voting trends among adults with disabilities for the 2024 Presidential Election, and we provide suggestions for future education and research and additional facilitators to enhance voting rates for older Americans with or without disabilities.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.