FORTIFYING SCHOLARSHIP IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: AN EXAMINATION OF THE MARGINALIZATION OF DRAG ARTISTS

Abstract Over 14 states have passed or are considering legislation that severely restricts and criminalizes public drag performances. Some bills erroneously label the artistry as “adult cabaret performances” thus, conflating them with nude performances. The Americans Civil Liberties Union, Movement Advancement Project, and other organizations have declared a state of emergency due to this endangerment of constitutionally protected individual human rights. 7.2 to 8 % of the U.S. adult population identifies as sexual and gender minorities (SGM) (HRC, 2021, Gallup,2023). Drag artists are a smaller population within SGM communities and it is believed that the language of anti-drag legislation is designed to also oppress transgender individuals (a separate SGM community). Overall, 2024 has seen 478 anti-LGBTQ bills, 21 of which are drag-specific Several prominent scholars (e.g., Steven Miller of Clemson) have called attention to the similarity between these attacks and the process of “othering” used by Hitler to create public acceptance of annihilation of Jews, the disabled, sexual and gender minorities and ultimately, members of any politically or economically inconvenient group (e.g., older, retired adults). This individual presentation provides a framework to guide scholarly observation and understanding of the current attacks and clarifies the relevant contributions that only scholars can make to produce scientifically valid information and knowledge about Drag Artists and their social and economic impacts on USA society and the economy, thereby strengthening and informing decisions about laws and policy that govern individual freedom of expression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0746
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FORTIFYING SCHOLARSHIP IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: AN EXAMINATION OF THE MARGINALIZATION OF DRAG ARTISTS

Lyn Holley, Kenneth Hites
1 links
Innovation in Aging
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

FORTIFYING SCHOLARSHIP IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: AN EXAMINATION OF THE MARGINALIZATION OF DRAG ARTISTS

Lyn Holley, Kenneth Hites
article en

Abstract

Abstract Over 14 states have passed or are considering legislation that severely restricts and criminalizes public drag performances. Some bills erroneously label the artistry as “adult cabaret performances” thus, conflating them with nude performances. The Americans Civil Liberties Union, Movement Advancement Project, and other organizations have declared a state of emergency due to this endangerment of constitutionally protected individual human rights. 7.2 to 8 % of the U.S. adult population identifies as sexual and gender minorities (SGM) (HRC, 2021, Gallup,2023). Drag artists are a smaller population within SGM communities and it is believed that the language of anti-drag legislation is designed to also oppress transgender individuals (a separate SGM community). Overall, 2024 has seen 478 anti-LGBTQ bills, 21 of which are drag-specific Several prominent scholars (e.g., Steven Miller of Clemson) have called attention to the similarity between these attacks and the process of “othering” used by Hitler to create public acceptance of annihilation of Jews, the disabled, sexual and gender minorities and ultimately, members of any politically or economically inconvenient group (e.g., older, retired adults). This individual presentation provides a framework to guide scholarly observation and understanding of the current attacks and clarifies the relevant contributions that only scholars can make to produce scientifically valid information and knowledge about Drag Artists and their social and economic impacts on USA society and the economy, thereby strengthening and informing decisions about laws and policy that govern individual freedom of expression.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.