HOW DOES THE USE OF HIGH-COST TREATMENTS IMPACT UTILIZATION OF THE MEDICARE HOSPICE BENEFIT?

Abstract Medicare patients who may benefit from palliative chemotherapy, radiation, or blood transfusions for symptom management (hereafter called “high-cost treatments”) may face difficulties accessing those treatments while electing hospice. The Medicare hospice benefit allows these high-cost treatments, but the treatments’ cost may exceed hospice agencies’ Medicare payments, limiting hospices’ ability to cover high-cost treatments. Lack of access to high-cost treatments may discourage transitions to hospice, resulting in costly and less patient-centered care. Using 100% Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare Part A/B claims, we examine how frequently these high-cost treatments are used at the end of life and how hospice use varies by the receipt of high-cost treatments. 7,631,620 FFS Medicare beneficiaries died from FY 2017-2021 and roughly 19.8% of those received at least one high-cost treatment in the 180 days before death (8.3% used chemotherapy, 3.73% used radiation, 12.8% used transfusions) and 47.1% used hospice in the 180 days before death. Of the 786,402 beneficiaries that used both hospice and at least one high-cost treatment in the 180 days before death, only 16,478 (2.1%) used hospice and a high-cost treatment simultaneously. We also found that the average hospice length of stay for those using high-cost treatments in the last 180 days of life is substantially shorter than for beneficiaries electing hospice without using those services (chemotherapy recipients - 22.9 days, radiation recipients – 23.2 days, transfusion recipients -25.5 days, non-recipients – 105.6 days). These findings may indicate barriers to receiving hospice for beneficiaries who may benefit from high-cost palliative treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0750
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HOW DOES THE USE OF HIGH-COST TREATMENTS IMPACT UTILIZATION OF THE MEDICARE HOSPICE BENEFIT?

Michael Plotzke, Thomas Christian
Innovation in Aging
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

HOW DOES THE USE OF HIGH-COST TREATMENTS IMPACT UTILIZATION OF THE MEDICARE HOSPICE BENEFIT?

Michael Plotzke, Thomas Christian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Medicare patients who may benefit from palliative chemotherapy, radiation, or blood transfusions for symptom management (hereafter called “high-cost treatments”) may face difficulties accessing those treatments while electing hospice. The Medicare hospice benefit allows these high-cost treatments, but the treatments’ cost may exceed hospice agencies’ Medicare payments, limiting hospices’ ability to cover high-cost treatments. Lack of access to high-cost treatments may discourage transitions to hospice, resulting in costly and less patient-centered care. Using 100% Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare Part A/B claims, we examine how frequently these high-cost treatments are used at the end of life and how hospice use varies by the receipt of high-cost treatments. 7,631,620 FFS Medicare beneficiaries died from FY 2017-2021 and roughly 19.8% of those received at least one high-cost treatment in the 180 days before death (8.3% used chemotherapy, 3.73% used radiation, 12.8% used transfusions) and 47.1% used hospice in the 180 days before death. Of the 786,402 beneficiaries that used both hospice and at least one high-cost treatment in the 180 days before death, only 16,478 (2.1%) used hospice and a high-cost treatment simultaneously. We also found that the average hospice length of stay for those using high-cost treatments in the last 180 days of life is substantially shorter than for beneficiaries electing hospice without using those services (chemotherapy recipients - 22.9 days, radiation recipients – 23.2 days, transfusion recipients -25.5 days, non-recipients – 105.6 days). These findings may indicate barriers to receiving hospice for beneficiaries who may benefit from high-cost palliative treatments.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Abt Global (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.