OFFERING ACCREDITATION TO ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITIES IN NORTH CAROLINA

Abstract In 2021, the North Carolina Legislature approved and funded the Adult Care Home [Assisted Living] Accreditation Pilot Program. Across the state, the program’s goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of accreditation through quality outcome measures to determine whether accreditation achieves compliance with licensure requirements and improves or maintains quality of care compared to a control group. Assisted living communities were selected using stratified random sampling that accounted for geographic region and state-assigned quality rating. A total of 146 communities originally agreed to participate. Of the 73 communities randomly assigned to the accreditation arm, to date 39 (53%) either withdrew or chose to not go through the process of accreditation; 4 (5%) withdrew after beginning the accreditation process; 24 (33%) achieved accredited status; and 6 (8%) are delayed in completing the process or not likely to do so. The key reason for withdrawal from the accreditation process is the time and effort required in the context of staffing shortages, which has implications for long-range implementation even if accreditation is found to be beneficial. This session will present the aims and methods of the evaluation; the accreditation process itself (including benefits, potential administrative burden, and types of deficiencies found during surveys); the feasibility of becoming accredited for diverse participating communities; and potential strategies to bolster capacity for accreditation. (Additional contributors to this and the outcome presentation include Teresa Hoosier [ACHC], Jeff Horton [NCSLA], Frances Messer [NCALA], Barbara Sylvester [ACHC], and London Grantham, Aja Johnson, Danielle Owens, Toni Parker, and Katrice Perry [UNC].)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0504
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OFFERING ACCREDITATION TO ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITIES IN NORTH CAROLINA

Philip D. Sloane, Scott Davis, Lea Efird, John S. Preisser et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

OFFERING ACCREDITATION TO ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITIES IN NORTH CAROLINA

Philip D. Sloane, Scott Davis, Lea Efird, John S. Preisser, Yanyan Tian, Sheryl Zimmerman, David C. Reed
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2021, the North Carolina Legislature approved and funded the Adult Care Home [Assisted Living] Accreditation Pilot Program. Across the state, the program’s goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of accreditation through quality outcome measures to determine whether accreditation achieves compliance with licensure requirements and improves or maintains quality of care compared to a control group. Assisted living communities were selected using stratified random sampling that accounted for geographic region and state-assigned quality rating. A total of 146 communities originally agreed to participate. Of the 73 communities randomly assigned to the accreditation arm, to date 39 (53%) either withdrew or chose to not go through the process of accreditation; 4 (5%) withdrew after beginning the accreditation process; 24 (33%) achieved accredited status; and 6 (8%) are delayed in completing the process or not likely to do so. The key reason for withdrawal from the accreditation process is the time and effort required in the context of staffing shortages, which has implications for long-range implementation even if accreditation is found to be beneficial. This session will present the aims and methods of the evaluation; the accreditation process itself (including benefits, potential administrative burden, and types of deficiencies found during surveys); the feasibility of becoming accredited for diverse participating communities; and potential strategies to bolster capacity for accreditation. (Additional contributors to this and the outcome presentation include Teresa Hoosier [ACHC], Jeff Horton [NCSLA], Frances Messer [NCALA], Barbara Sylvester [ACHC], and London Grantham, Aja Johnson, Danielle Owens, Toni Parker, and Katrice Perry [UNC].)

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.