ARE UNDERSERVED GROUPS INCLUDED IN AGING RESEARCH? RESULTS ACROSS MANY CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES

Abstract Research can be inherently biased when results cannot be generalized across different subsets of a population that differ from those enrolled in the study. Thus, it is critical to recruit a diverse range of individuals who represent the entire population and who represent the disease or health condition being studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics of 3,454 individuals enrolled in 11 clinical studies conducted from 2002-2023 and supported by the Wake Forest Older Americans Independence Center. Studies included recruited >80 participants and had a minimum age eligibility of 55 years with no upper age exclusion. The total number of individuals phone screened for participation was 19,937. The characteristics of those enrolled were compared to those who were initially screened for participation to assess whether eligibility criteria enabled participants to approximately match the characteristics of those who inquired about participation. The demographics of the screened participants were: Age (mean±SD), 69.8±7.0 yrs; 69% female; 76.4% non-Hispanic white/23.6% black; and 79.3% with at least some college education. The enrolled participants were: Age, 69.8±6.6 yrs; 64% female; 76.1% non-Hispanic white/23.9% black; and 80.5% with some college education. The age distribution of those screened ranged from 23-98 years with 43.7% being >70 yrs, 19.9%> 75 yrs, and 6.8%> 80 yrs while the distribution of those enrolled ranged from 55-92 years with 45.2% being >70 yrs, 20.7%> 75 yrs, and 7.6%> 80 yrs. Further analyses will compare these demographics to those of the 5 counties surrounding the research center.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0407
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARE UNDERSERVED GROUPS INCLUDED IN AGING RESEARCH? RESULTS ACROSS MANY CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES

Kristen M. Beavers, Rebecca H. Neiberg, Xiaoyan Leng, Denise K. Houston et al.
Innovation in Aging
Global Health Care Issues
article

ARE UNDERSERVED GROUPS INCLUDED IN AGING RESEARCH? RESULTS ACROSS MANY CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES

Kristen M. Beavers, Rebecca H. Neiberg, Xiaoyan Leng, Denise K. Houston, W. Jack Rejeski, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Barbara Nicklas, Michael E. Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research can be inherently biased when results cannot be generalized across different subsets of a population that differ from those enrolled in the study. Thus, it is critical to recruit a diverse range of individuals who represent the entire population and who represent the disease or health condition being studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics of 3,454 individuals enrolled in 11 clinical studies conducted from 2002-2023 and supported by the Wake Forest Older Americans Independence Center. Studies included recruited >80 participants and had a minimum age eligibility of 55 years with no upper age exclusion. The total number of individuals phone screened for participation was 19,937. The characteristics of those enrolled were compared to those who were initially screened for participation to assess whether eligibility criteria enabled participants to approximately match the characteristics of those who inquired about participation. The demographics of the screened participants were: Age (mean±SD), 69.8±7.0 yrs; 69% female; 76.4% non-Hispanic white/23.6% black; and 79.3% with at least some college education. The enrolled participants were: Age, 69.8±6.6 yrs; 64% female; 76.1% non-Hispanic white/23.9% black; and 80.5% with some college education. The age distribution of those screened ranged from 23-98 years with 43.7% being >70 yrs, 19.9%> 75 yrs, and 6.8%> 80 yrs while the distribution of those enrolled ranged from 55-92 years with 45.2% being >70 yrs, 20.7%> 75 yrs, and 7.6%> 80 yrs. Further analyses will compare these demographics to those of the 5 counties surrounding the research center.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Wake Forest University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.