Static Timing Analysis of Nonlinear-Feedback Shift Register

An 8-bit Non-Linear Feedback Shift Register (NLFSR) is designed and implemented using Verilog, with synthesis and timing analysis conducted on the Vivado platform. The NLFSR employs a non-linear feedback function with a dynamic feedback selection mechanism, enhancing the randomness of the generated keystream. In contrast, the conventional LFSR utilizes a fixed polynomial feedback, resulting in simpler architecture but comparatively weaker randomness in the keystream. Worst Negative Slack (WNS) and Worst Hold Slack (WHS) are measured to evaluate the performance. The WNS of NLFSR and LFSR are 7.165ns and 7.820ns, whereas the WHS are 0.284ns and 0.132ns, respectively. The findings show that while NLFSRs are more complex due to nonlinear feedback, they produce a more robust and random keystream compared to LFSRs, which are simpler but less random. This highlights the trade-off between complexity and performance, with NLFSRs offering superior keystream quality.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/csitss64042.2024.10816802
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Static Timing Analysis of Nonlinear-Feedback Shift Register

N Shylashree, S Hithesh, S Yugasni, Chirukuri Uttam et al.
1 citations
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
0.21
article

Static Timing Analysis of Nonlinear-Feedback Shift Register

N Shylashree, S Hithesh, S Yugasni, Chirukuri Uttam, N Chandan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An 8-bit Non-Linear Feedback Shift Register (NLFSR) is designed and implemented using Verilog, with synthesis and timing analysis conducted on the Vivado platform. The NLFSR employs a non-linear feedback function with a dynamic feedback selection mechanism, enhancing the randomness of the generated keystream. In contrast, the conventional LFSR utilizes a fixed polynomial feedback, resulting in simpler architecture but comparatively weaker randomness in the keystream. Worst Negative Slack (WNS) and Worst Hold Slack (WHS) are measured to evaluate the performance. The WNS of NLFSR and LFSR are 7.165ns and 7.820ns, whereas the WHS are 0.284ns and 0.132ns, respectively. The findings show that while NLFSRs are more complex due to nonlinear feedback, they produce a more robust and random keystream compared to LFSRs, which are simpler but less random. This highlights the trade-off between complexity and performance, with NLFSRs offering superior keystream quality.

Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.