Image Quality Assessment

In an age where visual intelligence products are omnipresent, images hold a significant position in digital communication. Image-based applications are ubiquitous in our daily lives. The implementation in this paper enhances the distorted image with the help of a reference image using the DISTS and ADISTS algorithms, evaluating IQA metrics, and comparing the performance of both models in image enhancement tasks. The results indicate that DISTS is particularly effective at improving traditional pixel-based metrics like PSNR which is 13.15% higher than ADISTS algorithm and aids in lowering the MSE by 17.86% more compared to ADISTS, making it ideal for tasks that demand high pixel-level accuracy. On the other hand, ADISTS shines in enhancing perceptual quality metrics such as SSIM, MS-SSIM, and VIFP, by 2.46%,0.52% and 16.7% respectively compared to DISTS algorithm indicating that it is more effectively captures structural details and enhances visual quality, for the sea anemone image which was executed for 2000 iterations for the both DISTS and ADISTS algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/csitss64042.2024.10817020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Quality Assessment

G Ranjani, N Sri Haripriya
1 citations
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Image Quality Assessment

G Ranjani, N Sri Haripriya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In an age where visual intelligence products are omnipresent, images hold a significant position in digital communication. Image-based applications are ubiquitous in our daily lives. The implementation in this paper enhances the distorted image with the help of a reference image using the DISTS and ADISTS algorithms, evaluating IQA metrics, and comparing the performance of both models in image enhancement tasks. The results indicate that DISTS is particularly effective at improving traditional pixel-based metrics like PSNR which is 13.15% higher than ADISTS algorithm and aids in lowering the MSE by 17.86% more compared to ADISTS, making it ideal for tasks that demand high pixel-level accuracy. On the other hand, ADISTS shines in enhancing perceptual quality metrics such as SSIM, MS-SSIM, and VIFP, by 2.46%,0.52% and 16.7% respectively compared to DISTS algorithm indicating that it is more effectively captures structural details and enhances visual quality, for the sea anemone image which was executed for 2000 iterations for the both DISTS and ADISTS algorithms.

D A Pandu Memorial RV Dental College and Hospital (IN), R.V. College of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Image Quality Assessment — G Ranjani, N Sri Haripriya · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS