Differentiated End-to-End Security Provisioning Mechanism for 5G Systems

In the current 5G system architecture, the use cases around user plane security enforcement are oriented and limited to security configuration towards the NG-RAN, based on the integrity and/or ciphering protection activation or deactivation in the air interface between user equipment (UE) and gNB. Security features between gNB and User Plane Function (UPF) are optional, configured by the network provider, and there is no end-to-end protection for the user plane data. However, the gNB is more vulnerable to attacks due to its physical location, which leads to data and privacy leakage. Additionally, the mapping from service data flow to QoS flow is mainly based on QoS requirements rather than security, which means the service data flows with similar QoS but different security requirements will be mapped to the same QoS flow and then be processed with the same security protection on the air interface. Moreover, 3GPP only supports coarse-grained Packet Data Unit (PDU) session level integrity protection, i.e., all QoS flows in the same PDU session have to share the same security configuration at the UEgNB interface. This will lead to either high security overhead if only a few QoS flows need protection or inadequate protection if protection is disabled since the majority of the flows do not require it. In this paper, we propose a backward-compatible differentiated (per-QoS flow) end-to-end security mechanism allowing the protection of only those QoS flows that require ciphering and/or integrity protection. The security options can be changed dynamically during the QoS flow lifetime. Our numerical results show that the proposed solution allows us to decrease the computational burden imposed at UE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pimrc59610.2024.10817461
Primary Topic
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated End-to-End Security Provisioning Mechanism for 5G Systems

Nageen Himayat, Roman Glazkov, Dmitri Moltchanov, Yi Zhang et al.
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
article

Differentiated End-to-End Security Provisioning Mechanism for 5G Systems

Nageen Himayat, Roman Glazkov, Dmitri Moltchanov, Yi Zhang, Srikathyayani Srikanteswara, Vadim Gromovoy
article en

Abstract

In the current 5G system architecture, the use cases around user plane security enforcement are oriented and limited to security configuration towards the NG-RAN, based on the integrity and/or ciphering protection activation or deactivation in the air interface between user equipment (UE) and gNB. Security features between gNB and User Plane Function (UPF) are optional, configured by the network provider, and there is no end-to-end protection for the user plane data. However, the gNB is more vulnerable to attacks due to its physical location, which leads to data and privacy leakage. Additionally, the mapping from service data flow to QoS flow is mainly based on QoS requirements rather than security, which means the service data flows with similar QoS but different security requirements will be mapped to the same QoS flow and then be processed with the same security protection on the air interface. Moreover, 3GPP only supports coarse-grained Packet Data Unit (PDU) session level integrity protection, i.e., all QoS flows in the same PDU session have to share the same security configuration at the UEgNB interface. This will lead to either high security overhead if only a few QoS flows need protection or inadequate protection if protection is disabled since the majority of the flows do not require it. In this paper, we propose a backward-compatible differentiated (per-QoS flow) end-to-end security mechanism allowing the protection of only those QoS flows that require ciphering and/or integrity protection. The security options can be changed dynamically during the QoS flow lifetime. Our numerical results show that the proposed solution allows us to decrease the computational burden imposed at UE.

Intel (United States) (US), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differentiated End-to-End Security Provisioning Mechanism for 5G Systems — Nageen Himayat, Roman Glazkov, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS