Oral Health Problems Perceived: Electronic Cigarettes versus Conventional Smokers

Electronic cigarettes are currently becoming a new trend for smokers, particularly among youth and young adults. Oral health problems related to their use are still not fully understood compared to the adverse effects of conventional cigarettes that are widely recognized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers. The method used was an observational cross-sectional design comprising 100 enrolled college students at Universitas Sumatera Utara. Electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers were invited to participate in the study and data collection was carried out using a questionnaire. Frequencies and percentages were obtained for socio-demographic, Cigarette Dependence Index, and self-perceived oral health problems due to smoking according to their status. A Chi-square test was used to assess the variation between the study groups with the different factors. The result showed that there was no statistical difference in oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarettes and conventional smokers (p = 0.648). Irritation of the mouth, cracked or broken tooth, and dry mouth were more prevalent in electronic cigarettes at 24%, 36%, and 64%, compared to conventional smokers at 14%, 28%, and 56%, respectively. In conclusion, this study observed no difference in oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentika Dental Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32734/dentika.v27i2.17720
Primary Topic
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Health Problems Perceived: Electronic Cigarettes versus Conventional Smokers

Indri Lubis, Sayuti Hasibuan, Aisyah Noer, Hertika Sari Sinabutar
Dentika Dental Journal
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
article

Oral Health Problems Perceived: Electronic Cigarettes versus Conventional Smokers

Indri Lubis, Sayuti Hasibuan, Aisyah Noer, Hertika Sari Sinabutar
article en

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes are currently becoming a new trend for smokers, particularly among youth and young adults. Oral health problems related to their use are still not fully understood compared to the adverse effects of conventional cigarettes that are widely recognized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers. The method used was an observational cross-sectional design comprising 100 enrolled college students at Universitas Sumatera Utara. Electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers were invited to participate in the study and data collection was carried out using a questionnaire. Frequencies and percentages were obtained for socio-demographic, Cigarette Dependence Index, and self-perceived oral health problems due to smoking according to their status. A Chi-square test was used to assess the variation between the study groups with the different factors. The result showed that there was no statistical difference in oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarettes and conventional smokers (p = 0.648). Irritation of the mouth, cracked or broken tooth, and dry mouth were more prevalent in electronic cigarettes at 24%, 36%, and 64%, compared to conventional smokers at 14%, 28%, and 56%, respectively. In conclusion, this study observed no difference in oral health problems perceived between electronic cigarette users and conventional smokers.

Dentika Dental JournalVol. 27(2)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID)
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.