The Rejection of the Voice for Aboriginal People in Australia – A Postmortem of Causes of Failure

On 14 October 2023, the Australian electorate rejected by an overwhelming majority a proposal for a constitutionally guaranteed advisory body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. This was the fourth attempt in Australia to create an advisory voice for Aboriginal people, but the first time it was attempted via a constitutional amendment involving a public vote. The rejection is continuing to reverberate through Australian society. To many Aboriginal people this was not only a rejection of a technical proposal, but a rejection of their aspirations of self-determination. This article reflects on some of the root causes why in the view of the author, the referendum failed. The article is critical of the lack of information about the composition and functions of the proposed Voice as well as the inconsistencies between various reports and public documents. These contributed to public scepticism and rejection of the proposal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constitutional Review
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rejection of the Voice for Aboriginal People in Australia – A Postmortem of Causes of Failure

Bertus de Villiers
2 citations
Constitutional Review
Multilingual Education and Policy
3.77
article

The Rejection of the Voice for Aboriginal People in Australia – A Postmortem of Causes of Failure

Bertus de Villiers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

On 14 October 2023, the Australian electorate rejected by an overwhelming majority a proposal for a constitutionally guaranteed advisory body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. This was the fourth attempt in Australia to create an advisory voice for Aboriginal people, but the first time it was attempted via a constitutional amendment involving a public vote. The rejection is continuing to reverberate through Australian society. To many Aboriginal people this was not only a rejection of a technical proposal, but a rejection of their aspirations of self-determination. This article reflects on some of the root causes why in the view of the author, the referendum failed. The article is critical of the lack of information about the composition and functions of the proposed Voice as well as the inconsistencies between various reports and public documents. These contributed to public scepticism and rejection of the proposal.

Constitutional ReviewVol. 10(2)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multilingual Education and Policy
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.