Complexity-Informed Governance for Contemporary International Security

International security challenges in today's world spring from myriad sources in what might be considered a multilevel vertical and horizontal interactive global system, in which each governance level is autonomous yet interdependent with other levels. The risks and uncertainties arising through these interactions in different forms of security arrangements—global, national, and human—need to be seen for what they are: complex adaptive systems (CAS) with many layers of autonomous yet interdependent actors and variables. Traditional linear, deterministic, and reductionist approaches cannot adequately deal with the resulting emergent issues, as the assumptions of linearity and determinism in which outputs are proportional to inputs, where cause and effect are observable, no longer hold. Complex systems thinking and anticipatory governance as the frameworks utilised provide an alternative epistemic perspective for the analysis of international security, and this research seeks to exemplify it through the case study of the Iraq Crisis. This original research paper explores the Iraq War Crisis through the viewpoint of complexity, and encourages the adoption of a holistic systems perspective in upcoming research on global affairs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jindal Journal of Public Policy
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v8i1.252
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexity-Informed Governance for Contemporary International Security

Namesh Killemsetty, Naresh Singh, Ojus Sharma, Divyanshi Sharda
Jindal Journal of Public Policy
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Complexity-Informed Governance for Contemporary International Security

Namesh Killemsetty, Naresh Singh, Ojus Sharma, Divyanshi Sharda
article en

Abstract

International security challenges in today's world spring from myriad sources in what might be considered a multilevel vertical and horizontal interactive global system, in which each governance level is autonomous yet interdependent with other levels. The risks and uncertainties arising through these interactions in different forms of security arrangements—global, national, and human—need to be seen for what they are: complex adaptive systems (CAS) with many layers of autonomous yet interdependent actors and variables. Traditional linear, deterministic, and reductionist approaches cannot adequately deal with the resulting emergent issues, as the assumptions of linearity and determinism in which outputs are proportional to inputs, where cause and effect are observable, no longer hold. Complex systems thinking and anticipatory governance as the frameworks utilised provide an alternative epistemic perspective for the analysis of international security, and this research seeks to exemplify it through the case study of the Iraq Crisis. This original research paper explores the Iraq War Crisis through the viewpoint of complexity, and encourages the adoption of a holistic systems perspective in upcoming research on global affairs.

Jindal Journal of Public Policy
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.