CONFLICT REZOLUTION MECHANIZM IN DEFENS TECH KEY TRENDS AND CHALLENGES

The article examines the key mechanisms for conflict resolution in the defense technology sector (defense tech), which is of strategic importance for national and global security. The rapid development of defense technologies, including artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and other innovations, creates new opportunities but also significant challenges, such as conflicts between government agencies, private companies, and international organizations. The study aims to analyze existing mechanisms for resolving conflicts in defense tech, identify major trends and challenges, and propose recommendations for improving regulatory and ethical approaches. Systematic analysis, comparative methods, and legal framework reviews were employed to achieve this goal. The findings indicate that the primary mechanisms for conflict resolution in defense tech include regulatory tools, international cooperation, mediation, and innovative technological platforms. Regulatory tools provide a legal framework for the use of cutting-edge technologies, while international cooperation facilitates dialogue between states to prevent conflict escalation. Innovative approaches, such as the use of artificial intelligence for risk monitoring and blockchain technologies for contract transparency, hold significant potential for reducing conflicts. The analysis also highlights key trends in the defense tech sector: strengthening ethical standards and social responsibility, integrating advanced technologies, and enhancing international regulations. However, significant challenges remain, including technological inequality, ethical dilemmas, restricted access to confidential data, and national security concerns. Rapid technological advancements exacerbate disparities in access to defense technologies between countries, potentially leading to new international conflicts. Future research could focus on developing regulatory frameworks that address the dynamic growth of artificial intelligence, automated systems, and big data analytics. A critical area of study is the exploration of collaboration models between public and private entities, as well as the implementation of ethical standards to minimize conflicts in the defense technology sector. Keywords: defense technology, conflict resolution, artificial intelligence, mediation, ethical standards, national security, regulatory mechanisms, technological inequality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific notes of the UniversityKROK
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2024-76-209-214
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONFLICT REZOLUTION MECHANIZM IN DEFENS TECH KEY TRENDS AND CHALLENGES

И. Н. Василенко, Ігор Окунєв
Scientific notes of the UniversityKROK
Digital Transformation in Law
article

CONFLICT REZOLUTION MECHANIZM IN DEFENS TECH KEY TRENDS AND CHALLENGES

И. Н. Василенко, Ігор Окунєв
article en

Abstract

The article examines the key mechanisms for conflict resolution in the defense technology sector (defense tech), which is of strategic importance for national and global security. The rapid development of defense technologies, including artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and other innovations, creates new opportunities but also significant challenges, such as conflicts between government agencies, private companies, and international organizations. The study aims to analyze existing mechanisms for resolving conflicts in defense tech, identify major trends and challenges, and propose recommendations for improving regulatory and ethical approaches. Systematic analysis, comparative methods, and legal framework reviews were employed to achieve this goal. The findings indicate that the primary mechanisms for conflict resolution in defense tech include regulatory tools, international cooperation, mediation, and innovative technological platforms. Regulatory tools provide a legal framework for the use of cutting-edge technologies, while international cooperation facilitates dialogue between states to prevent conflict escalation. Innovative approaches, such as the use of artificial intelligence for risk monitoring and blockchain technologies for contract transparency, hold significant potential for reducing conflicts. The analysis also highlights key trends in the defense tech sector: strengthening ethical standards and social responsibility, integrating advanced technologies, and enhancing international regulations. However, significant challenges remain, including technological inequality, ethical dilemmas, restricted access to confidential data, and national security concerns. Rapid technological advancements exacerbate disparities in access to defense technologies between countries, potentially leading to new international conflicts. Future research could focus on developing regulatory frameworks that address the dynamic growth of artificial intelligence, automated systems, and big data analytics. A critical area of study is the exploration of collaboration models between public and private entities, as well as the implementation of ethical standards to minimize conflicts in the defense technology sector. Keywords: defense technology, conflict resolution, artificial intelligence, mediation, ethical standards, national security, regulatory mechanisms, technological inequality.

Scientific notes of the UniversityKROK(4(76))
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.