IMPLEMENTING SMART AMBIENT BRIGHT LIGHT FOR NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA: ASSESSING FIDELITY

Abstract Up to 90% of persons with dementia experience neurobehavioral symptoms and poor sleep which may be associated with limited daylight exposure and circadian disruptions. Lighting interventions regulate the circadian rhythm and have been shown to reduce agitation. Smart Ambient Bright Light (SABL) incorporates natural light and is an automatic lighting system that delivers bright light during the day (photopic illuminance ≥400 lux, circadian stimulus [CS]≥0.3) and dim light during the night (lux≤40, CS ≤0.1). Two methods were used to assess SABL fidelity. First, manual measurements were conducted during the daytime twice a week. Second, each participant wore a light sensor to measure individual lighting exposure for 24 hours, 7 days a week, every other week. Manual measurement results indicated that the SABL lighting conditions across different spaces generally met the targets during daytime (lux: mean=394.2, SD=49.75; CS: mean=0.302, SD=0.07). Individual sensors also showed that participants’ average daytime light exposure during the intervention met the target for lux (mean=406.9, CI=369.9-443.8) and CS (mean=0.363, CI= 0.332-0.393). Individual nighttime lighting exposure during the intervention was above target for lux (mean=94.5. CI= 82.3-106.7) and CS (mean=0.111, CI=0.098-0.124). Additionally, participants received higher daytime CS (t=-8.7, p< 0.001) and daytime lux (t=-8.48, p< 0.0001) while also receiving lower nighttime CS (t=4.43, p=0.0001) and nighttime lux (t=7.4, p< 0.0001) during the intervention period than the control period. The results indicate the SABL achieved fidelity for daytime, but its fidelity for nighttime, especially lux, could be improved. Future studies should incorporate lessons learned to improve SABL implementation fidelity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4349
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTING SMART AMBIENT BRIGHT LIGHT FOR NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA: ASSESSING FIDELITY

Ying-Ling Jao, Diane Berish, Shevvaa Beiglary, Yo-Jen Liao et al.
1 links
Innovation in Aging
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
article

IMPLEMENTING SMART AMBIENT BRIGHT LIGHT FOR NURSING HOME RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA: ASSESSING FIDELITY

Ying-Ling Jao, Diane Berish, Shevvaa Beiglary, Yo-Jen Liao, Julian Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Up to 90% of persons with dementia experience neurobehavioral symptoms and poor sleep which may be associated with limited daylight exposure and circadian disruptions. Lighting interventions regulate the circadian rhythm and have been shown to reduce agitation. Smart Ambient Bright Light (SABL) incorporates natural light and is an automatic lighting system that delivers bright light during the day (photopic illuminance ≥400 lux, circadian stimulus [CS]≥0.3) and dim light during the night (lux≤40, CS ≤0.1). Two methods were used to assess SABL fidelity. First, manual measurements were conducted during the daytime twice a week. Second, each participant wore a light sensor to measure individual lighting exposure for 24 hours, 7 days a week, every other week. Manual measurement results indicated that the SABL lighting conditions across different spaces generally met the targets during daytime (lux: mean=394.2, SD=49.75; CS: mean=0.302, SD=0.07). Individual sensors also showed that participants’ average daytime light exposure during the intervention met the target for lux (mean=406.9, CI=369.9-443.8) and CS (mean=0.363, CI= 0.332-0.393). Individual nighttime lighting exposure during the intervention was above target for lux (mean=94.5. CI= 82.3-106.7) and CS (mean=0.111, CI=0.098-0.124). Additionally, participants received higher daytime CS (t=-8.7, p< 0.001) and daytime lux (t=-8.48, p< 0.0001) while also receiving lower nighttime CS (t=4.43, p=0.0001) and nighttime lux (t=7.4, p< 0.0001) during the intervention period than the control period. The results indicate the SABL achieved fidelity for daytime, but its fidelity for nighttime, especially lux, could be improved. Future studies should incorporate lessons learned to improve SABL implementation fidelity.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.