INTERIM ANALYSIS: VALIDATION OF THE AGITATION IN ALZHEIMER’S SCREENER FOR CAREGIVERS (AASC®)

Abstract Agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia often goes unrecognized or underreported, contributing to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) set a standard for defining agitation in cognitive disorders. The Agitation in Alzheimer’s Screener for Caregivers (AASC®), the first clinical tool based on IPA criteria, was developed to support caregiver-healthcare professional (HCP) discussion and timely recognition of agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia. It has 2 questions assessing presence and impact of agitation behaviors. This ongoing, prospective, multisite, single-visit observational study will calculate predictive metrics for recognizing agitation by the AASC® versus IPA criteria. Interim (n=50 caregiver-HCP dyads) and final (n=150 dyads) analyses will determine agreement rates (yes/no) and sensitivity/specificity. This ongoing interim analysis included 44 dyads (caregivers completed AASC®; HCPs completed IPA criteria). Most patients/caregivers were female (70%/50%) and 74 (±7.3)/58 (±18.9) years old. Most caregivers were White (57%), a spouse/partner (43%) or child (23%), and spent a mean (SD) of 40.8 (44.3) hours/week providing care. Percentage agreement between AASC® and IPA was 70.45%; Cohen’s kappa coefficient (level of agreement) was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.62). The number of false positives/negatives using AASC® was 3/10; positive/negative predictive values (95% CI) were 0.727 (0.464, 0.991)/0.697 (0.540, 0.854). The strongest contributor to false negatives on the AASC® was caregivers’ minimization of the impact of agitation behaviors on patient functioning, underscoring a key educational gap. These results suggest that the AASC® can improve caregiver-HCP communication and awareness of agitation behaviors and their impact, thereby advancing early recognition of agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4228
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTERIM ANALYSIS: VALIDATION OF THE AGITATION IN ALZHEIMER’S SCREENER FOR CAREGIVERS (AASC®)

George T. Grossberg, Sheri Fehnel, Sue Peschin, Malaak Brubaker et al.
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

INTERIM ANALYSIS: VALIDATION OF THE AGITATION IN ALZHEIMER’S SCREENER FOR CAREGIVERS (AASC®)

George T. Grossberg, Sheri Fehnel, Sue Peschin, Malaak Brubaker, Mehul Patel, Will Jackson, Carolyn Clevenger, Jared Stroud
article en

Abstract

Abstract Agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia often goes unrecognized or underreported, contributing to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) set a standard for defining agitation in cognitive disorders. The Agitation in Alzheimer’s Screener for Caregivers (AASC®), the first clinical tool based on IPA criteria, was developed to support caregiver-healthcare professional (HCP) discussion and timely recognition of agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia. It has 2 questions assessing presence and impact of agitation behaviors. This ongoing, prospective, multisite, single-visit observational study will calculate predictive metrics for recognizing agitation by the AASC® versus IPA criteria. Interim (n=50 caregiver-HCP dyads) and final (n=150 dyads) analyses will determine agreement rates (yes/no) and sensitivity/specificity. This ongoing interim analysis included 44 dyads (caregivers completed AASC®; HCPs completed IPA criteria). Most patients/caregivers were female (70%/50%) and 74 (±7.3)/58 (±18.9) years old. Most caregivers were White (57%), a spouse/partner (43%) or child (23%), and spent a mean (SD) of 40.8 (44.3) hours/week providing care. Percentage agreement between AASC® and IPA was 70.45%; Cohen’s kappa coefficient (level of agreement) was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.62). The number of false positives/negatives using AASC® was 3/10; positive/negative predictive values (95% CI) were 0.727 (0.464, 0.991)/0.697 (0.540, 0.854). The strongest contributor to false negatives on the AASC® was caregivers’ minimization of the impact of agitation behaviors on patient functioning, underscoring a key educational gap. These results suggest that the AASC® can improve caregiver-HCP communication and awareness of agitation behaviors and their impact, thereby advancing early recognition of agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
OhioHealth (US), Emory University (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Alliance for Aging Research (US), Otsuka (United States) (US), RTI Health Solutions (US), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.