DECISION TO SCREEN: CAREGIVERS VOICES IN MAMMOGRAPHY DECISION-MAKING WITH DEMENTIA

Abstract The USPSTF recommends mammograms through 74 years old and data suggest that individuals should have a life expectancy of 10 years for a mortality benefit. Mammography beyond 75 may increase burden and risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment; dementia may exacerbate this burden. Despite guidelines and changing risks and benefits, many over 75 who have life limiting illnesses receive mammograms; it’s unclear what motivates these decisions. Therefore, this descriptive qualitative analysis explored dementia caregivers descriptions about the decision to undergo or not undergo mammography screening for their relatives with dementia. Sixty dyads from an IRB-approved study on mammography decision-making completed interviews. Regarding the decision to screen, a main theme emerged: unconscious choice. Sub-themes included: 1) automatic reoccurring event; 2) healthcare provider recommended; 3) hospital/healthcare organization recommended, 4) family history. Some identified it as an automatic reoccurring event (“It was needed for general health, and it’s something that we do in our household religiously.”). In consultation with a healthcare provider some decided to proceed with mammograms (“Her doctor said it was time for her annual mammogram and he would schedule it”). Numerous were prompted to receive a mammogram by a hospital/healthcare organization (“We received a reminder in the mail that it was time for me, and it was time for her, and I just made the appointment. There was no discussion.”). Lastly, participants identified that their family history of cancer prompted them. Overall, many participants may not have recognized mammography as a choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4153
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DECISION TO SCREEN: CAREGIVERS VOICES IN MAMMOGRAPHY DECISION-MAKING WITH DEMENTIA

Nicole R. Fowler, Adele Crouch
Innovation in Aging
Cancer survivorship and care
article

DECISION TO SCREEN: CAREGIVERS VOICES IN MAMMOGRAPHY DECISION-MAKING WITH DEMENTIA

Nicole R. Fowler, Adele Crouch
article en

Abstract

Abstract The USPSTF recommends mammograms through 74 years old and data suggest that individuals should have a life expectancy of 10 years for a mortality benefit. Mammography beyond 75 may increase burden and risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment; dementia may exacerbate this burden. Despite guidelines and changing risks and benefits, many over 75 who have life limiting illnesses receive mammograms; it’s unclear what motivates these decisions. Therefore, this descriptive qualitative analysis explored dementia caregivers descriptions about the decision to undergo or not undergo mammography screening for their relatives with dementia. Sixty dyads from an IRB-approved study on mammography decision-making completed interviews. Regarding the decision to screen, a main theme emerged: unconscious choice. Sub-themes included: 1) automatic reoccurring event; 2) healthcare provider recommended; 3) hospital/healthcare organization recommended, 4) family history. Some identified it as an automatic reoccurring event (“It was needed for general health, and it’s something that we do in our household religiously.”). In consultation with a healthcare provider some decided to proceed with mammograms (“Her doctor said it was time for her annual mammogram and he would schedule it”). Numerous were prompted to receive a mammogram by a hospital/healthcare organization (“We received a reminder in the mail that it was time for me, and it was time for her, and I just made the appointment. There was no discussion.”). Lastly, participants identified that their family history of cancer prompted them. Overall, many participants may not have recognized mammography as a choice.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.