EXPLORING SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE DECLINE IN OLDER ADULTS: A MIXED METHODS APPROACH

Abstract Objective This study aims to explore the cognitive health of older adults exhibiting SCD by using a mixed methods approach to identify the factors and implications of perceived cognitive decline, thereby contributing to early intervention strategies. Methods We employed a convergent parallel mixed-method design. Quantitative data were collected using the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 21 items (DASC-21) and the 9-items Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q9) from 1,458 older adults without clinical dementia in Soochow, China. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews to capture detailed narratives on cognitive complaints, their perceived causes, and impacts on daily life. Results Quantitative analysis revealed that 48.7% of participants experienced SCD, with significant associations found with advanced age, low education levels, underweight, diabetes, cataract/glaucoma, osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, and ischemic heart disease. Qualitative thematic analysis identified three primary themes: cognitive complaints, multifactorial attributions of cognitive decline, and the effects on daily life. Conclusion Our findings underscore the importance of recognizing SCD in older adults as a possible precursor to more severe cognitive impairment. The mixed methods approach provided a comprehensive understanding, suggesting that both objective and subjective assessments are critical for early detection and intervention. These insights highlight the need for tailored interventions focusing on modifiable risk factors and enhancing quality of life for older adults with SCD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4367
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE DECLINE IN OLDER ADULTS: A MIXED METHODS APPROACH

Huiling Li, Xi Wen
Innovation in Aging
Health and Well-being Studies
article

EXPLORING SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE DECLINE IN OLDER ADULTS: A MIXED METHODS APPROACH

Huiling Li, Xi Wen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aims to explore the cognitive health of older adults exhibiting SCD by using a mixed methods approach to identify the factors and implications of perceived cognitive decline, thereby contributing to early intervention strategies. Methods We employed a convergent parallel mixed-method design. Quantitative data were collected using the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 21 items (DASC-21) and the 9-items Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q9) from 1,458 older adults without clinical dementia in Soochow, China. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews to capture detailed narratives on cognitive complaints, their perceived causes, and impacts on daily life. Results Quantitative analysis revealed that 48.7% of participants experienced SCD, with significant associations found with advanced age, low education levels, underweight, diabetes, cataract/glaucoma, osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, and ischemic heart disease. Qualitative thematic analysis identified three primary themes: cognitive complaints, multifactorial attributions of cognitive decline, and the effects on daily life. Conclusion Our findings underscore the importance of recognizing SCD in older adults as a possible precursor to more severe cognitive impairment. The mixed methods approach provided a comprehensive understanding, suggesting that both objective and subjective assessments are critical for early detection and intervention. These insights highlight the need for tailored interventions focusing on modifiable risk factors and enhancing quality of life for older adults with SCD.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Soochow University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.