CARING FOR ONE, TWO, OR THREE GENERATIONS? PREVALENCE OF VARIOUS CAREGIVING ROLES AND CAREGIVER CHARACTERISTICS

Abstract With increasing diversification in household composition and living arrangements over recent decades, the roles of family caregivers have become more complex, sometimes requiring individuals to assume multiple caregiving responsibilities such as caring for both grandchildren and older parents. While caregiving can be a rewarding experience, it can negatively affect caregiver well-being, especially for those providing high-intensity care. Given that family caregivers are the backbone of our care system, it is crucial to understand who these caregivers are and their health and wellbeing. This study provides a profile of U.S. intergenerational caregivers using data from 2018 RAND Health and Retirement Study (HRS) family files and HRS core public files. We estimate the prevalence of four different caregiver types (i.e., caring for older parents only, spouses only, grandchildren only, and those filling more than one caregiving role) overall and by socio-demographic characteristics. We also compare the socio-demographic characteristics and health outcomes (e.g., self-reported health and depression) of different caregiver types to non-caregivers. Our results showed that one in three adults age 50 or older were caregivers, the majority of which only cared for one generation: grandchildren, spouses, or older adults. Approximately 14% of caregivers cared for multiple types of family members. Caregiver profiles and health outcomes vary by caregiver type. For example, spousal caregivers had the highest depression score compared to individuals only caring for grandchildren or older parents and those filling more than one caregiving role. This knowledge is essential for establishing a foundation for targeted interventions to support caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4138
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CARING FOR ONE, TWO, OR THREE GENERATIONS? PREVALENCE OF VARIOUS CAREGIVING ROLES AND CAREGIVER CHARACTERISTICS

Hua Zan, Melissa A. Barnett, Loriena A. Yancura
Innovation in Aging
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

CARING FOR ONE, TWO, OR THREE GENERATIONS? PREVALENCE OF VARIOUS CAREGIVING ROLES AND CAREGIVER CHARACTERISTICS

Hua Zan, Melissa A. Barnett, Loriena A. Yancura
article en

Abstract

Abstract With increasing diversification in household composition and living arrangements over recent decades, the roles of family caregivers have become more complex, sometimes requiring individuals to assume multiple caregiving responsibilities such as caring for both grandchildren and older parents. While caregiving can be a rewarding experience, it can negatively affect caregiver well-being, especially for those providing high-intensity care. Given that family caregivers are the backbone of our care system, it is crucial to understand who these caregivers are and their health and wellbeing. This study provides a profile of U.S. intergenerational caregivers using data from 2018 RAND Health and Retirement Study (HRS) family files and HRS core public files. We estimate the prevalence of four different caregiver types (i.e., caring for older parents only, spouses only, grandchildren only, and those filling more than one caregiving role) overall and by socio-demographic characteristics. We also compare the socio-demographic characteristics and health outcomes (e.g., self-reported health and depression) of different caregiver types to non-caregivers. Our results showed that one in three adults age 50 or older were caregivers, the majority of which only cared for one generation: grandchildren, spouses, or older adults. Approximately 14% of caregivers cared for multiple types of family members. Caregiver profiles and health outcomes vary by caregiver type. For example, spousal caregivers had the highest depression score compared to individuals only caring for grandchildren or older parents and those filling more than one caregiving role. This knowledge is essential for establishing a foundation for targeted interventions to support caregivers.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), University of Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.