DISPARITIES IN LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY LUNG CANCER SCREENING IN THE UNITED STATES: A MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS

Abstract Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is recommended for high-risk smokers to decrease lung cancer-related mortality and increase prognosis. In the U.S., the uptake of LDCT screening among eligible smokers is suboptimal. The impacts of social-environmental and individual factors on LDCT screening uptake using nationally representative datasets are understudied. The current study investigated multi-level factors associated with LDCT screening using national data. Methods The 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, as well as other state-level variables (Medicaid expansion status and the number of screening facilities), were applied. The final study sample consisted of 15640 respondents from 29 states. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design applied in BRFSS. Results The overall utilization rate of LDCT screening is only 18.4%. The LDCT screening rate varied by state (6.2 -31.1%). LDCT screen rates were positively associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities per 10,000 smokers (r=0.67, p< 0.001). Among the respondents, individuals who were employed, never married, reported good health status, did not have primary care physicians, economic concerns like low income, did not have routine checkups, and did not have certain chronic conditions (i.e., cancer, asthma, COPD) had a lower utilization rate of LDCT screening compared with their counterpart. Conclusion The use of LDCT screening among eligible smokers remains low. Enhancing access to care for high-risk individuals, promoting services to diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, and expanding Medicaid coverage to incorporate annual LDCT screening can be used to guide future lung cancer screening programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.4165
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DISPARITIES IN LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY LUNG CANCER SCREENING IN THE UNITED STATES: A MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS

Hui‐Yi Lin, Chien‐Ching Li, Michael D. Celestin, Edward Trapido et al.
Innovation in Aging
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

DISPARITIES IN LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY LUNG CANCER SCREENING IN THE UNITED STATES: A MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS

Hui‐Yi Lin, Chien‐Ching Li, Michael D. Celestin, Edward Trapido, Tung‐Sung Tseng, Yu‐Wen Chiu, Kelsey N Witmeier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is recommended for high-risk smokers to decrease lung cancer-related mortality and increase prognosis. In the U.S., the uptake of LDCT screening among eligible smokers is suboptimal. The impacts of social-environmental and individual factors on LDCT screening uptake using nationally representative datasets are understudied. The current study investigated multi-level factors associated with LDCT screening using national data. Methods The 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, as well as other state-level variables (Medicaid expansion status and the number of screening facilities), were applied. The final study sample consisted of 15640 respondents from 29 states. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design applied in BRFSS. Results The overall utilization rate of LDCT screening is only 18.4%. The LDCT screening rate varied by state (6.2 -31.1%). LDCT screen rates were positively associated with the number of lung cancer screening facilities per 10,000 smokers (r=0.67, p< 0.001). Among the respondents, individuals who were employed, never married, reported good health status, did not have primary care physicians, economic concerns like low income, did not have routine checkups, and did not have certain chronic conditions (i.e., cancer, asthma, COPD) had a lower utilization rate of LDCT screening compared with their counterpart. Conclusion The use of LDCT screening among eligible smokers remains low. Enhancing access to care for high-risk individuals, promoting services to diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, and expanding Medicaid coverage to incorporate annual LDCT screening can be used to guide future lung cancer screening programs.

Innovation in AgingVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Rush University (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.